Re: [Jmol-users] testing, testing!

2010-07-26 Thread Robert Hanson
It's a bug introduced in RC27. Thanks very much for finding that. Will upload soon. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Van der Lee wrote: > This - taken from the Jmol wiki - does work under RC26, but not with RC28 > > for (var i=0; i<240; i=i+1) > write image 200 200 @{"movie" + ("" + i)[-3][

Re: [Jmol-users] testing, testing!

2010-07-26 Thread Van der Lee
This - taken from the Jmol wiki - does work under RC26, but not with RC28 for (var i=0; i<240; i=i+1) write image 200 200 @{"movie" + ("" + i)[-3][0] + ".gif"} /* 200 and 200 are width and height */ rotate axisangle {1 0 0} 1.5 /* axis is defined by X Y Z lengths between braces

Re: [Jmol-users] testing, testing!

2010-07-26 Thread Robert Hanson
Hmm. I'm not seeing that at all. Very small, very efficient IDTF files. Send me an example. Preferably as a PNG image of the state along with the data file. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > There might be optimization I could still do with ellipsoids. Let me take a > look.

Re: [Jmol-users] testing, testing!

2010-07-26 Thread Robert Hanson
There might be optimization I could still do with ellipsoids. Let me take a look. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Van der Lee wrote: > Bob, > > I tracked down the ellipsoid problem when generating 3D-pdf files. > As soon as 'spacefill ADPmin 50%' is given, the generated idtf-file > output become

Re: [Jmol-users] testing, testing!

2010-07-26 Thread Van der Lee
Bob, I tracked down the ellipsoid problem when generating 3D-pdf files. As soon as 'spacefill ADPmin 50%' is given, the generated idtf-file output becomes incredibly huge - over 2Mbyte for a small-molecule structure - to be compared with about 100 Kbyte before the spacefill ADPmin command. Ari

[Jmol-users] testing, testing!

2010-07-24 Thread Robert Hanson
Looks like RC27 is a loss. Here's RC28: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-11/Jmol-11.zip version=12.0.RC28 # bug fix: DATA statement broken # bug fix: Jmol Model Kit broken # bug fix: PROMPT command need not require @{...} # bug fix: a = {} needs to default to ({}) (empty bitset) b