Re: jmx-dev RFR 8020467: Inconsistency between usage.getUsed() and isUsageThresholdExceeded() with CMS Old Gen pool

2013-10-23 Thread Bengt Rutisson
Hi again Jaroslav, On 2013-10-23 17:07, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: On 23.10.2013 16:43, Bengt Rutisson wrote: Hi Jaroslav, On 2013-10-23 16:32, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: On 23.10.2013 15:15, Bengt Rutisson wrote: On 2013-10-23 14:55, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: Hi Bengt, On 23.10.2013 14:40

Re: jmx-dev RFR 8020467: Inconsistency between usage.getUsed() and isUsageThresholdExceeded() with CMS Old Gen pool

2013-10-23 Thread Bengt Rutisson
Hi Jaroslav, On 2013-10-23 16:32, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: On 23.10.2013 15:15, Bengt Rutisson wrote: On 2013-10-23 14:55, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: Hi Bengt, On 23.10.2013 14:40, Bengt Rutisson wrote: Hi Jaroslav, A couple of questions. I don't understand why this is a CMS only pr

Re: jmx-dev RFR 8020467: Inconsistency between usage.getUsed() and isUsageThresholdExceeded() with CMS Old Gen pool

2013-10-23 Thread Bengt Rutisson
On 2013-10-23 14:55, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: Hi Bengt, On 23.10.2013 14:40, Bengt Rutisson wrote: Hi Jaroslav, A couple of questions. I don't understand why this is a CMS only problem? Why don't the other collectors have the same issue? I guess it is less likely that the other

Re: jmx-dev RFR 8020467: Inconsistency between usage.getUsed() and isUsageThresholdExceeded() with CMS Old Gen pool

2013-10-23 Thread Bengt Rutisson
Hi Jaroslav, A couple of questions. I don't understand why this is a CMS only problem? Why don't the other collectors have the same issue? I guess it is less likely that the other collectors start (or complete) a GC without a lot of allocation going on. But at least G1 should have the same p