I am using Programmatic Code Generated in Java Spring Boot. I don't want to
generate whole schema again after a small change. At least file which
doesn't have changes shouldn't be regenerated. This show hug change in PR
review and hard to look after every bit of code.
--
You received this mes
Thanks for your message.
jOOQ doesn't modify (touch) files which don't have any changes in them.
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:57 PM Muhammad Atif
wrote:
> This show hug change in PR review and hard to look after every bit of code.
I'm afraid, I don't know what this means
--
You received this
Actually in my team if someone has different Line Separator (CRLF/LF)
configuration Jooq assumed there is a change in new file and generate it.
Same for imports configuration.
On Tuesday 28 May 2024 at 13:58:37 UTC+3 lukas...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for your message.
>
> jOOQ doesn't modify (
You shouldn't modify generated sources!
I understand that line separators may be changed by version control, so you
could adapt the code generator to produce what you're using elsewhere:
https://www.jooq.org/doc/latest/manual/code-generation/codegen-advanced/codegen-config-generate/codegen-whitesp
I solution of Line Separators and Space is resolved. Thank you.
For Imports in IDE different people has different configuration for "Class
count to use import with ''*". IDE make imports like import org.jooq.*;
after Jooq added.
On Tuesday 28 May 2024 at 15:20:45 UTC+3 lukas...@gmail.com wrote:
jOOQ cannot possibly detect what kind of change you did manually, and
respect that change. I'm not aware of any code generator that is able to
keep arbitrary changes in generated code.
IDEs can be configured to leave derived resources, such as generated code,
alone and not touch their contents.
I
Hello there,
This is not necessarily a jOOQ issue, but I wonder how you would best solve
it when using jOOQ. If it's too off-topic, feel free to direct me somewhere
else.
We have been using jOOQ happily for a while in production; every day we
have a couple of big bulk insert queries (insertin
> On May 28, 2024, at 9:16 AM, Giovanni Zotta
> wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> This is not necessarily a jOOQ issue, but I wonder how you would best solve
> it when using jOOQ. If it's too off-topic, feel free to direct me somewhere
> else.
>
> We have been using jOOQ happily for a while in
AFAIK copy does not have a returning clause, which I need to retrieve the
generated primary key IDs. Is there a way around that?
On Tuesday 28 May 2024 at 22:36:08 UTC+2 robjs...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On May 28, 2024, at 9:16 AM, Giovanni Zotta
> wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> This is not necess
> On May 28, 2024, at 1:41 PM, Giovanni Zotta
> wrote:
>
> AFAIK copy does not have a returning clause, which I need to retrieve the
> generated primary key IDs. Is there a way around that?
>
Yes. But my way is to assign ids in the client. If you’re using a sequence as
Id generator then y
Taking 2 minutes to insert 200k records is a little high, I see speeds of
around 35 seconds for 300k rows (and 12 seconds for 100k rows) with jOOQ.
I'm not sure what transactions you are using, but if you are using Spring
annotations, you can switch to using the TransactionTemplate and manually
11 matches
Mail list logo
