Re: [josm-dev] Don't delete dirty deleted primitives after upload

2010-08-07 Thread Upliner
Hi I see you've used git to generate these patches. Why not to push them to the GitHub or another git hosting? I've tried to apply your patches with git-am, but only first one applied well, other ones have failed to apply. I've already posted patches to do the same thing: http://josm.openstreetmap.

Re: [josm-dev] Windows-Installedefault projection is WGS84

2010-08-07 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Sebastian Klein wrote: I suppose the server build system picks up these changes automatically for next tested? No. Everything which changes build system needs manual review. I updated the installer build now. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___

Re: [josm-dev] Don't delete dirty deleted primitives after upload

2010-08-07 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Matthew W. S. Bell wrote: Patch 0002 stops the purging of deleted primitives that have not been uploaded after upload. The remaining patches are cleanups, during the process of finding 0002. Can you please post patches as Trac tickets. Attachements usually tend to be forg

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:46:30 +0200, Sebastian Klein wrote: > I would vote for keeping the changeset open by default. If the user > changes the changeset comment or other tags on subsequent upload, it > should ask if a new changeset should be started. I find this arrangement to be overly cumberso

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:22:39 +0200, Sebastian Klein wrote: > Dirk Stöcker wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Anthony wrote: >> >>> And it is something that should be consistent across different >>> editors. >> >> Actually this is nothing we need to worry about. JOSM is still settings >> the standards