Still feeling that cardinal directions only belong as roles in for child relations in super-relations.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to this list so please bear with me. > The relation editor currently only parses 'forward' and 'backward' > roles when considering the visual representation in the rightmost > column. In the United States, north/south and east/west are very > common as member roles for road routes, because that is how they are > officially signposted. > > There was some discussion in the original relation editor enhancement > ticket: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5109#comment:42 where > Petr_Dlouhy dismisses support for these member roles. > > I want to reopen that discussion and see if there is support for > treating north/south and east/west as first class citizens similar to > forward/backward in the relation editor (and perhaps in other parts, > perhaps the validator and way direction reversing code?). > > I am crossposting to talk-us because this discussion is going on there > at the moment. > > I would be more than happy to put in some of the work required to > implement this support. > > Thanks, > Martijn > -- > Martijn van Exel > http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ > http://openstreetmap.us/ > > _______________________________________________ > josm-dev mailing list > josm-dev@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev > _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev