On 6 May 2011 22:55, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I have just committed a first alpha of a license change plugin
> (svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/licensechange).
Great! This is a tool I've wanted for quite a while. It seems to be
doing what it's supposed to, but with an int
OK - I said I'd post again with my intentions. Here is a wiki page
that I hope will outline the automatic imagery adjustment mechanism
I've worked out with another mapper:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/True_Offset_Process
Comments are welcome. By now we're happy that we've described
somethin
On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Viesturs Zariņš wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> I would say we need to set up such a system as fast as possible and integrate
> with JOSM and Portlatch.
> Otherwise we will end up with lots of data traced with incorrect offsets.
>
> I would opt for submitting bug reports
Three cheers for Fred!
I haven't have a chance to try it out yet, but about 50% of SOTM
delegates seemed to be asking for this.
Dermot
2009/7/16 Frederik Ramm :
> Hi,
>
> I have committed a new and rather experimental "walking papers" plugin.
--
--
Iren s
2009/4/23 Frederik Ramm :
> Almost worthless, I'm sorry to say. Any automatic message can just as well
> be filled in later by some automatism on some server that compiles and
> anlyses changesets. What we're after is the "human" bit that no machine can
> replace!
A little harsh :(
Lest I've bee
2009/4/19 Stefan Bethke :
>> I'm currently trying to get webkit-image to work on 10.5.6.
Just so you know - I've done this and it works. I can't go into
details now (I'd have to remember first what I did), but if you can't
make it work I can either send you a binary or try to help make the
build
The issue of localisation frameworks is one that I've been considering
a lot in the last few weeks in my day job. Our application is built in
perl, and perl provides a more powerful, code-allowed tool called
maketext which does more or less what gettext does but with some extra
bells and whistles.
2009/1/16 Alex Pleiner :
>> * It dynamically links to qt. I _believe_ that my successful build
>> links against the Trolltech binary MacOS qt package, though it might
>> be the Macports build instead, as I have both installed.
>
> You would be my personal super hero if you could compile a statical
Folks,
After many false starts, I have managed to build webkit-image (qt) on
MacOS. I've attached my binary (I hope it gets through), and in theory
it could be made available along with the Windows equivalent, but here
are some caveats:
* It dynamically links to qt. I _believe_ that my successful
2008/12/21 Dirk Stöcker :
> a) I fixed the WMS displacement so it now again displaces the whole map and
> not a single image, but I did not get the display right. The
> visible/unvisible decision is still done based on the unmoved pics. (I can
> live with the fact that loading is done based on ori
2008/9/1 Petr Dlouhý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To render the pages I am using "gnome-web-photo" application, which simply
> saves the png image of the website to file. The problem is, that this
> application is only for Linux. I need to find similar application for
> Windows, so if somebody knows abo
2008/8/20 David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 20/08/2008 10:24, Dermot McNally wrote:
>>
>> Layers exist to
>> determine the drawing order of overlapping elements, nothing more.
>
> ... which rather violates the "don't tag for the renderer" maxim,
2008/8/20 Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think that both waterways and roads are layer 0, "the ground", and
> when one crosses another, the upper one should have layer=1 - because
> there's air between it and the actual surface of the earth. I would
> apply this to any ground-based physi
2008/8/20 Dirk Stöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is this different in your area?
In a word, "yes" :)
Map Features doesn't suggest this tagging scheme, and, while I can see
why people might do it, it makes little sense based on my local
mapping practice (caveat: I'm the first person to have mapped r
Is there a reason why the following rule in in place?:
way : I : waterway == * && layer != * #
waterway without layer tag
I have only ever set layer on a waterway where a canal crosses an
aqueduct, but that's a rare case indeed.
Dermot
--
--
2008/8/18 Henry Loenwind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> PS: pissed, because I just found a couple of added nodes in my command
> stack and have to redo my last 20 minutes of work because I don't know
> where they are and don't want to upload bogus nodes...
And that excuses rudeness on this scale directed
2008/8/18 Petr Nejedly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just don't like the appearance of the "virtual nodes". Could you turn them
> into
> small (nonzoomed), thin red plus signs instead of rendering them the same
> style
> as the way they sit on?
I love this new functionality, which as you say, is per
2008/8/16 Dirk Stöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Ah yes, so it is... It does force me to mouseover each violation,
>> though. For a large or detailed area, this is going to be very
>> impractical.
>
> Suggestions welcome.
I'd still favour my original suggestion - rather than group all of
these new
2008/8/16 Dirk Stöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This information is shown in the ToolTip. You get this when waiting a
> short time over the error message.
Ah yes, so it is... It does force me to mouseover each violation,
though. For a large or detailed area, this is going to be very
impractical.
>
2008/8/15 Dirk Stöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The default configuration file for this is here:
> http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/validator/tagchecker.cfg
I was excited by the prospect of a smarter validator, so I tried it
out. My first impression was "oh, it looks l
Hi folks,
Is anybody else having trouble with the slippy map chooser plugin?
I've just updated to josm-latest for the first time in about 2 weeks,
and have updated my plugins too. I have traced the problem to the
slippy map chooser plugin as per #1422.
Dermot
--
Hi folks,
While at SOTM I updated to the latest JOSM, to discover a new
"feature". Roundabouts are now displayed with a dark green fill, but
(the important bit) _without_ the outline colour correctly reflecting
the classification given in the highway tag. Is this
intentional/considered useful or i
2008/7/3 Till Amma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Freizeiteinrichtungen"
To me, that translates back to English as "Leisure Amenities", making
it overspecific. Think of courthouses, fire stations, fuel stations,
none of which are strictly related to leisure.
Dermot
--
2008/7/3 Dirk Stöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> access=destination and
> Wow. Hard to translate this with one word. Anyway managed to do translation
> nevertheless.
Isn't this the same as "Anlieger Frei"? In fact, it's a concept I've
only ever seen applied in Germany.
Dermot
--
---
2008/7/3 Dirk Stöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are there any other English words, which would describe the same?
> Has any of the German speakers an idea?
Einrichtung?
A bit general, I know, but so is "Amenity".
Dermot
--
--
Iren sind menschlich
2008/1/16 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have created a new plugin that displays geotagged images in a toggle
> dialog (and some little new features). It handles either exif data or GPX
> track correlation.
This works brilliantly - but with one niggle. I've found that
photographs with rotation info
Cases where uploading fails midway through and can't (easily) be
completed - due to precondition failure, for instance - suffer from
the fact that data self-consistency is lost because of the nodes-first
policy. In such cases, and I've often been victim to it, you end up
with a stack of nodes and n
On 24/01/2008, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because such a threshold makes it more difficult to move things for
> distances *below* the threshold (it is possible by first breaking free
> and then moving back, but that's cumbersome), I have also added a
> "nudge" function that lets yo
On 23/01/2008, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The normal fix for this sort of problem is a "drag threshold", whereby
> you have to drag an item a certain distance before it will "break free"
> and start moving. Was this solution considered?
It was one of the suggestions at the time.
On 09/01/2008, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're saying you got a dialogue box with an error message that
> contained coordinates? Totally news to me - next time this happens,
> can yo somehow make a screenshot or so?
It sounds to me like the validator plugin doing its precheck -
30 matches
Mail list logo
