On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Russ Nelson wrote:
> > My opinion is probably skewed by using source code repositories but
> > imho changes should not be grouped by bboxes, instead they should be
> > grouped logically under the changeset whose comment best fits the type
> > of change out of those you have op
andrzej zaborowski writes:
>
> 2009/12/29 Russ Nelson :
> > Is JOSM's Changeset support not quite right?
> >
> > I'm thinking that the way it should work instead is NOT close
> > Changesets ever. Instead, it should keep (all) the changeset(s) open,
> > and if you make another edit which is
2009/12/29 Russ Nelson :
> Is JOSM's Changeset support not quite right?
>
> I'm thinking that the way it should work instead is NOT close
> Changesets ever. Instead, it should keep (all) the changeset(s) open,
> and if you make another edit which is within the bounding box of an
> open changeset,
Is JOSM's Changeset support not quite right?
I'm thinking that the way it should work instead is NOT close
Changesets ever. Instead, it should keep (all) the changeset(s) open,
and if you make another edit which is within the bounding box of an
open changeset, it should default to adding it to th
