Hi John,
I'll take your word for it. I was just thinking it might of been a
quick solution as perhaps there are others out there doing the same.
As for the reasoning behind it there wasn't really any; just a curious
attempt while playing with the selectors.
I do however apprecate your feedback
I once wrote a recursive diff that would return the difference between
2 objects.
I'll dig it out tomorrow.
On 5 Oct, 21:35, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it shouldn't be that hard, but I'm struggling implementing a recursive
> comparsion of object structures in JavaScri
In a way it feels like we are trying to build just another class helper
instead of just using prototypes. I understand we want to make it easy to
build extendable and modular plugins/widgets. I think I see how the plugin
builder can help us do that but I think it would be wise to get it working
wit
As long as we could make this a standalone dependency without the
entanglement of convincing new users to use "jQuery UI" as a dependency, I'd
be cool with it.
-- Yehuda
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:15 AM, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree with both Yehuda and Brandon. It would be use
Hi,
it shouldn't be that hard, but I'm struggling implementing a recursive
comparsion of object structures in JavaScript. The goal is to have a
function that returns true when two given arguments are equal, false
if any single property isn't.
I want to add that to QUnit - any help implementing it
A different name may help to better convey the meaning (maybe queue?)
but otherwise I prefer this syntax a lot over the other proposals so
far.
Jörn
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:57 PM, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want to add one more proposal to the pile:
> http://dev.jquery.com/~john
I want to add one more proposal to the pile:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/plugins/chain/
A new .chain() method that allows you to write code like this:
jQuery("div")
.chain("hide", "slow")
.addClass("done")
.find("span")
.addClass("done")
.end()
.chain("show", "slow
About the default file structure: jQuery UI currently has a theme
folder, with a folder in there according to the name of the theme.
Inside that are .css files and another folder, called images. All
images referenced within the css files are inside that folder.
So assuming that a plugin comes with
console.log("raw time", +new Date - start);
+new Date --> Yeah!
>
> start = +new Date;
> for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
>var tainted = Object.tainted();
>for (var key in test) {
>if (!tainted || !Object.prototype[key]) {
>fn(key, test[key
Exactly. Even on the rare occasion when someone uses a full url with
http://it is pretty simple to just ignore those.
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Jörn Zaefferer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would simply assume that any URL within the CSS file is a
> relative URL, which seems to be a sa
About the confusion/explaining thing: $.plugin would provide a
documented API for creating non-trivial plugins. With a few examples,
people would be able to use it without having to understand all the
underlying abstractions. Eventually they need to learn them anyway,
but so far basically everyone
That would simply assume that any URL within the CSS file is a
relative URL, which seems to be a safe bet. Having absolute URLs in
there doesn't make too much sense anyway, at least not in this
context.
Jörn
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ca-Phun Ung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good stuff! One
I already did it:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/plugins/callback/
my other proposal:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/plugins/callback/old.html
I'm working on a third proposal now.
A nice thing about $.callback is that it's very simple (perhaps too
simple - no support for chaining).
--John
On Sat,
I agree with both Yehuda and Brandon. It would be useful to a certain
portion of plugin developers (it just so happens that there's a large
overlap in the realm of jQuery UI). But the potential confusion that
could be introduced would not serve us well.
I'd like to propose something: We let the A
I agree.
BTW, talking about currying...
I made my curry() version some time ago, with a nice demo.
If someone wants to check:
http://demos.flesler.com/Curry/
Cheers
--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com
On Oct 4, 11:56 am, Cloudream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not like passing a j
15 matches
Mail list logo
