[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread seasoup
fwiw, I dont think it is time to drop ie6 support yet. Some organizations require ie6 support, which would mean that they cannot adopt jquery. Give it another year. On Feb 21, 5:39 pm, Daniel Friesen wrote: > Wasn't the memory leak issue IE<=6 only? I thought that was fixed in 7. > That is a f

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Daniel Friesen
Wasn't the memory leak issue IE<=6 only? I thought that was fixed in 7. That is a fairly big portion of compatibility code, half the library uses less efficient techniques to avoid memory leaks. ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://nadir-seen-fire.com] -Nadir-Point & Wiki-Tools (h

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
Diego, it's just about pushing "from inside" to remove that obsolete browser from the web. John already explained the fact that IE6 tricks are almost the same (Sizzle as well?) Anyway, it was just a try :-) On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Diego Perini wrote: > > Andrea, > dropping support for I

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Alexandre Plennevaux
thank you for the extra info ! The speed improvement in 1.3.2 is amazing: with 1.3.1 i used to see that whole menu appear briefly on page load; with 1.3.2, that's history. Great! On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:37 PM, John Resig wrote: > >> Thanks to your explanation, I found a way to fix it: >> >> i

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread John Resig
> Thanks to your explanation, I found a way to fix it: > > i simply added this to my stylesheet: > > html.js #stratas ul{ > /* this is necessary, otherwise jquery :visible does not work */ >width:100%; > } > > > btw, do you know of a good way to make sure that an UL automatically > adjust its

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Alexandre Plennevaux
Thanks to your explanation, I found a way to fix it: i simply added this to my stylesheet: html.js #stratas ul{ /* this is necessary, otherwise jquery :visible does not work */ width:100%; } btw, do you know of a good way to make sure that an UL automatically adjust its dimensions to its c

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Alexandre Plennevaux
this (work in progress) : http://m2.lab-au.com/ navigate sequence: theory > writing > articles thank you for your time John! Alexandre On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:25 PM, John Resig wrote: > > So looking at your page - your ULs are, technically, not visible. > Their width and height are 0 (all

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread John Resig
So looking at your page - your ULs are, technically, not visible. Their width and height are 0 (all of its contents escape outside). If you examine the elements in Firebug you see something similar: The ULs are dimmed (noting that they aren't visible). What are you trying to create? --John On

[jquery-dev] OT: Global Variable scope

2009-02-21 Thread weepy
What's the mechanism by which a variable is available both by it's name and also as a property of 'window' I.e. var x = "hello" window.x => "hello" ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Develop

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Alexandre Plennevaux
I have a strange rendering bug occuring since upgrading to 1.3.2 from 1.3.1 and even one of the nighty release (end of january) i have a (very complex) menu, marked up with unordered lists. Interaction with it toggles classes so that only the relevant ones are shown. at some point i test how man

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Diego Perini
John, some great updates you are releasing, everything has been improved, new functionalities and increased speed for the core methods. Events management covers most of what I would expect. The bits about "return false" and ".stopPropagation()" on ".live()" will be very useful. My compliments to

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Diego Perini
Andrea, dropping support for IE6 will not help reduce the code in any way. The same part of code is still needed in both IE7 and IE8. What are the advantages in only have support for IE7 and IE8 ? Diego On 21 Feb, 17:24, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > Ok, I tried :D > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 4:

[jquery-dev] Re: enhance .toggleClass

2009-02-21 Thread John Resig
Yep, good call, done. --John On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Cloudream wrote: > > Add this into 1.4 roadmap ? > > On Jan 12, 1:25 pm, Iraê wrote: >> I tooke some time to implement this functionality and also included >> unit tests in my patch proposal. >> >> http://dev.jquery.com/attachmen

[jquery-dev] Re: enhance .toggleClass

2009-02-21 Thread Cloudream
Add this into 1.4 roadmap ? On Jan 12, 1:25 pm, Iraê wrote: > I tooke some time to implement this functionality and also included > unit tests in my patch proposal. > > http://dev.jquery.com/attachment/ticket/3825/toggleClass.diff > > Hope it helps! =) > > On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, Cloudream wrote: >

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
Ok, I tried :D On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 4:09 PM, John Resig wrote: > > Heh, that's not happening, no. > > If we drop support for IE6 we might as well drop support for IE7 - we > have more bugs that we have to work around in IE7 than we do in IE6 - > and considering that there were no significant

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread John Resig
Heh, that's not happening, no. If we drop support for IE6 we might as well drop support for IE7 - we have more bugs that we have to work around in IE7 than we do in IE6 - and considering that there were no significant JavaScript/DOM bugs fixed in IE7 - it's virtually identical to IE6, as far as w

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
I partially agree but consider that: 1. developers, all of them, would like to see IE6 death 2. if jQuery will loose IE6 compatibility, developers can only be stuck (they won't) or comunicate to the company that technologies are moving and IE6 support effort is not possible anymore (bl

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Fabio Buffoni
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good Stuff Guys, but I wonder when you'll decide to put the word END in > front of "Supports IE6" ... any chance libraries will start to do it and > accordingly remove dust and rubbish from their core? > > A

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
Good Stuff Guys, but I wonder when you'll decide to put the word END in front of "Supports IE6" ... any chance libraries will start to do it and accordingly remove dust and rubbish from their core? An announcement like: jQuery 1.4 will not support IE6 ... is it too much to ask, isn't it? :-) On

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread John Resig
Yep, the team at Microsoft is working on it. --John On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:57 AM, jerone wrote: > > Good work. > Visual Studio version comming soon? > > gr J > > On 21 feb, 02:05, John Resig wrote: >> Hi Everyone - >> >> Full details here:http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3.2 >> >>

[jquery-dev] Re: jQuery 1.3.2 Released

2009-02-21 Thread jerone
Good work. Visual Studio version comming soon? gr J On 21 feb, 02:05, John Resig wrote: > Hi Everyone - > > Full details here:http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3.2 > > Enjoy! > > --John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscri