[jquery-dev] Re: ajax options parameter

2009-11-01 Thread Markw65
Ticket # 5439 created. Mark On Oct 30, 8:12 pm, Dave Methvin wrote: > > The ajax options parameter, unlike every other(?) options > > parameter, is used "in place". > > That does seem kind of fishy. I don't recall seeing a ticket for this, > it's at least worth considering. Do you want to create

[jquery-dev] Re: $(0) inconsistent with $(1), $(2)

2009-11-01 Thread Dave Methvin
> Why does $(0) return a document? Is this intended behaviour? In 1.3.2, $(anything_falsy) returns the document. In the nightlies, $ (anything_falsy) returns an empty jQuery object. It was changed because $(undefined) returned the document and that could lead to some hard-to-debug situations. > I

Re: [jquery-dev] $(0) inconsistent with $(1), $(2)

2009-11-01 Thread John Resig
This changed slightly in the latest nightlies - if you do $(0) it'll be as if you did $() or $([]). As of now any false-ish value will give you an empty jQuery set. Considering that there is no intended behavior for passing in a number to the jQuery object this seems fine to me. I'm curious - why

[jquery-dev] $(0) inconsistent with $(1), $(2)

2009-11-01 Thread Xavier Shay
> $(0).get(0) Document > $(1).get(0) 1 > $(2).get(0) 2 Why does $(0) return a document? Is this intended behaviour? I would expect it to return 0. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery

Re: [jquery-dev] 'hover' pseudo element - access thru jQuery?

2009-11-01 Thread Julian Aubourg
You could protect your rules with a noscript tag: .show { color: red } Hello world In this example, the span would only be in red when javascript is off. 2009/10/31 jez > Hi all, > > I have a minor pr