+1
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Paul Irish wrote:
> +1 for keeping the nightly truly "nightly"
>
> It's a huge boon to people that want to test the latest code in their
> real-world apps.
>
> On Dec 12, 11:02 am, alexander farkas
> wrote:
> > You have made a lot of changes since your Alpha
Awesome!
Great work guys!
-- Elijah
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:44 PM, John Resig wrote:
> More details here:
> http://blog.jquery.com/2009/12/04/jquery-14-alpha-1-released/
>
> --John
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jQuery Development" grou
looks like 2009-08-10 17:22:31 to me
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:07 AM, mharen wrote:
>
> The current nightly from http://code.jquery.com/jquery-nightly.js is
> old. Is it intentionally pinned to r6529/2008-08-10?
>
> /*!
> * jQuery JavaScript Library v1.3.3pre
> * http://jquery.com/
> *
> * C
Gabejazz,
>From what I understand, it looks like you have a form that looks like:
If not, then I think this might be a problem with the code provided.
Please try what Rick Waldron suggested, as it may give you a better
perspective into the problem. Beware though, you will need Firefox a
haha, simply amazing!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> damn it :D
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, John Resig wrote:
>
>> Too late:
>> http://dev.jquery.com/changeset/6511
>>
>> --John
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:21 AM, An
This question is probably better suited for the jQuery general list, as this
one is for
the development of jQuery. That list can be found here:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en
To answer your question, $.get is asynchronous which means the event will
never be properly canceled
as your cli
I believe there is something like this already in place!
-- taken from: http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/jquery/src/fx.js
timerId = setInterval(function(){
var timers = jQuery.timers;
for ( var i = 0;
Thats pretty cool
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:26 PM, jquerypla...@gmail.com <
jquerypla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hello people
>
> i started a new project called jplanet. it's a content aggregator
> about jquery.
>
> see more in http://jplanet.tumblr.com/
>
> thanks
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~
using @ to specify attributes was depricated in 1.2.6, but fully removed in
1.3.*
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:52 AM, sumanth wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using the function $("sele...@name='bb']").change() to access
> the select box value in my code. When i tried to load the page i am
> getting
var x = window.x = "hello";
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:23 PM, weepy wrote:
>
> What's the mechanism by which a variable is available both by it's
> name and also as a property of 'window'
>
> I.e.
>
> var x = "hello"
>
> window.x => "hello"
>
> ?
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~--
Packer is slower to execute, as it has to unpack itself every page load.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:44 AM, KidsKilla wrote:
>
> Hi!
> It's just interesting: is there any reason (except of convenience) to
> use YUI instead of /packer/ ?
>
> Packer 3.1
> jQuery 54 865
> gripped 20,91 Kb (21 408 byte
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:36 PM, KidsKilla .grin! wuz here <
kidski...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2009/1/28 John Resig :
> >
> > A whole mess of problems:
> > - Caches queries with reckless abandon - this is incredibly bad on
> > any sort of dynamic document (aka - all of jQuery)
> it is, but maybe th
link is broken.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:01 PM, KidsKilla wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> Did you seen this tests? It's just amazing! espesially in IE.
> Maybe it's a good idea to cooperate Sizzle and YACC developers?
>
>
> http://yass.webo.in/en/slickspeed/?Dojo_Toolkit_1-2-0/Peppy_0-1-2/DOMAssist
Brice,
This *seeems* like a simple matter.. although I have never tried it.
before jQuery is released it is 'built' from its component parts as seen
here: http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/jquery/
perhaps you could modify the build script to include only the items that you
want.
-- Elija
that is really smelly, IMHO
-- Elijah
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Matt wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 12:48 pm, John Resig wrote:
> > > Specifically, I have a modal dialog plugin which needs to "detect" IE6
> > > and IE7 in quirks mode. IE6 detection is needed for deciding whether
> > > or not to
I see, guess I'm just a bit late to the party!
Thanks
-- Elijah
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM, John Resig wrote:
>
> > why did you write qunit and not use something like YUI Test?
> > or make it xUnit compatible for that matter?
>
> YUI Test didn't exist - nor did really any other reasonabl
Slightly off topic:
why did you write qunit and not use something like YUI Test?
or make it xUnit compatible for that matter?
-- Elijah
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
> Looks great, David! Well done!
>
> --Karl
>
>
> Karl Swedberg
> www.englishrules.com
> www
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Friesen
wrote:
>
> Well yes, but that's just a simple example. You could go and setup an
> animation that involves some extravagant set of movements or color
> flashing over the simple "squeeze this in this way", provide that as a
> type of show/hide animat
>
> Has there been any thought, discussion, or interest in providing
> jQuery as a backend, or being able to provide another library as
> another API to jQuery.
Sizzle might be of interest to you, although it is *just* a selector
engine..
>
>
> jQuery is quite mature (even though a bug I couldn
Perhaps tacking on a 'returnValue' on to the object that is returned.. that
is however quite smelly.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Ariel Flesler wrote:
>
> I agree with Dave, $.each already returns data so changing it would
> break old code (even our own).
> Also.. I think we should not mess
afaik: safari has are issues with case sensitivity and selectors when in
quirks mode.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matt wrote:
>
> Could anyone explain this statement on the wiki page?
>
> "You should always be sure to run your page in standards mode. There
> are
> known issues with methods
Very nice, Thank You!
-- Elijah
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Leeoniya wrote:
>
> Epic win! and awesomest news ever!
> good move on joining the Software Freedom Conservancy, too.
>
> cheers,
> Leon
>
>
> On Jan 14, 8:45 am, John Resig wrote:
> > Hey Everyone -
> >
> > jQuery 1.3 is out! Fu
That is really sexy.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:52 AM, John Resig wrote:
>
> For this reason we gave you all the tools that you need to do your
> specific delegation.
>
> For example:
>
> $("#mycontainer").mousemove(function(e){
> $(e.target).closest("td").each(function(){
>// do something
The logic to detect a mouseenter via mouseover seems pretty standard.
If we are voting, I'd say put it in jQuery
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
> mouseenter never worked with event delegation, so I'm not surprised that it
> isn't working with .live(). mouseover should work
Thank you, I just moved cross country and have been really busy.
Apparently I missed these
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:54 PM, "Richard D. Worth"
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Elijah Insua
> wrote:
>
> This list? I must be blind. M
This list? I must be blind. My appologies
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 22, 2008, at 7:18 PM, "John Resig" wrote:
>
>> Dropping support?
>>
>> I'd like to be more involved with these types of decisions even if
>> it's just being aware. Where do you guys discuss this stuff?
>
> We've been mentio
Dropping support?
I'd like to be more involved with these types of decisions even if
it's just being aware. Where do you guys discuss this stuff?
Thanks
-- Elijah
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 22, 2008, at 6:38 PM, "Jörn Zaefferer" wrote:
> Afaik we are dropping support for Safari 2, so tha
I agree. The use cases for things like this can be handled more
appropriately with
static getter methods. Unless you are working with multiple documents being
rendered
under different browsers. unlikely!
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:16 AM, ajpiano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems intere
works for me
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Paul Hammant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://ui.jquery.com/bugs/report/1
>
> Seems to barf for me.
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery D
read the docs.
http://docs.jquery.com/Manipulation/wrap#html
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Julian Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Could someone explain to me why the following page shows four text boxes?
> Seems like it should be a relatively inoffensive operation.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
I agree with dave. An added bonus would be to automatically have the
functionality instead of having to include another js file.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A few years back I started planning a "lint plugin" but jQuery was
> changing quickly at th
savy. I bet we could poke Ariel with a stick
> and see how he responds? Is MIT/GPL the goal?
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Elijah Insua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> I do appreciate it! I guess i was just thinking out loud as I am curren
x27;maintain a scheme' and how open
> source prohibits that, but I was just trying to provide a helpful example.
> good luck!
>
> Thatcher
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Elijah Insua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> sounds really cool, the only down sid
gt; On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> It sounds like what you're looking for is something like E4X:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E4X
>>>
>>> Unfortunately it doesn't have very good brow
I agree, if there is an exception it is probably better to just use it.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Returning false seems to me like the same as making it die silently.
>
> I'd rather let the error go up, or throw our own error.
>
> --
> Ariel Fles
First Post!~
What do you think about using the xpath engine for querying object
structures?
To my understanding the 'only' way to actually run xpath/xquery
functionality on
xml is to first convert it into an object. Why not convert it into a
standard object
that can be queried generically?
-- El
36 matches
Mail list logo
