With Windows Mobile, IE is a very poor mobile browser, so I usually replace
it with Opera, which I others may do as well, so it would be good if it was
supported. I wouldn't be surprised if it was as standards complaint as the
desktop version.
--Sam
2010/1/11 John Resig
> > Thanks, nice intervi
on your computer. This page
> may not display correct. Click here for options..." But I'm not sure
> what that's in relation to (commenting out *all* the ActiveX logic
> still causes the bar to still pop up).
>
> --John
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:
Hi,
>From what I recall from a few years back, XMLHttpRequest asynchronous
requests do not work with local files, which I think may be the reason why
ActiveX is used. Maybe check if it is being used on a local page (not
tested), e.g.
xhr: function() {
if (location.protocol !== "file:" && window.
IE7 does have native XMLHttpRequest, but even then jQuery does not use it...
I think because it does not work with file:// URIs.
--Sam
2009/6/6 diogobaeder
>
> OK... fine for me... but doesn't IE7 have its own XMLHttpRequest
> implementation, for example? I thought it did...
>
> Anyway, the wors
Problem is that even though IE6 is losing market share for home users, in
workplaces IE6 can still be used, mostly for compatibility reasons. Very
frustrating when you are a developer coding to standards, while corporate
systems require IE6, even though they have been updated and cost a lot.
Will b
2008/11/5 Choan Gálvez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Sam Collett wrote:
>
> > [...] At the moment, there are parts that
> > have comments, but others that don't or are confusing (I have no
> > idea how
> > 'wrap' in
A debug plugin would certainly be useful for many developers, but it would
need to advertised and perhaps the developer reminded that it is being used
(with some sort of notification).
For example, if the debug plugin is included, show an alert (or perhaps be
more unobtrusive, but still noticeable
If Sizzle is likely to be included in multiple projects wouldn't duplication
occur (i.e. jQuery and TinyMCE on the same page)? Or would you include
Sizzle then the libraries, e.g.
js/sizzle.js
js/jquery.js
js/tinymce.js
Sizzle sounds like it will be of a benefit to many developers, even those
that
in the right
> direction, at least.
>
> --John
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Not something I can replicate at the moment (no access to an ASP.NET
> > site currently), but it is the resul
innerHTML is a special case as it is a property rather than an attribute.
Best to access it using $("#id").html() or $("#id")[0].innerHTML.
-Sam
2008/10/13 Robert Accettura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think this is more a misunderstanding of how jQuery works.
>
> $('#id').attr('innerHTML', 'somethin
> cause this effect.
>
> --John
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyone experience this before? Only happens in Firefox (tested with
> > 3), Internet Explorer is fine.
>
> > I use ajaxError to alert a messag
Anyone experience this before? Only happens in Firefox (tested with
3), Internet Explorer is fine.
I use ajaxError to alert a message when there is a server side error
that isn't caught properly (ASP.NET). It is a full html document,
which is auto generated (no control over it).
Problem is, some
Firefox isn't even in jQuery.browser, so unlikely Chrome will be. If Chrome
is added, Firefox should be too. Although Safari is in it instead of WebKit
(not sure why that is, especially since the version does not match the
browser).
--Sam
2008/9/16 jonhobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I wish this is
13 matches
Mail list logo
