> > jQuery.each(jQuery.browser, function(i, val) {
> > if(i=="mozilla" )
> > alert("Do stuff for firefox 3")
>
> > });
> > which is not working what so ever.
>
> i will never == "mozilla"; i is an integer. You need to test val (or
> this).
Oops. My mistake, I misread your code. What you
> jQuery.each(jQuery.browser, function(i, val) {
> if(i=="mozilla" )
> alert("Do stuff for firefox 3")
>
> });
> which is not working what so ever.
i will never == "mozilla"; i is an integer. You need to test val (or
this).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rece
> While I appreciate your concerns, I think you're operating under a
> mistaken notion of what "deprecation" means. The $.browser method
> still exists. The whole idea of deprecation is to allow a transition
> period:
Further, it *is* possible to be properly compatible with both 1.2.6
and
> $.boxModel is deprecated as of 1.3
Oops, I meant: $.support.boxModel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To
> > The only "solution" that I can think of is to just bite the bullet and
> > put the iframe behind the overlay in every browser - but that's lame.
>
> Tried that and had a backlash from my plugin users ;)
Really? I took this approach from the very beginning with blockUI. I
use an iframe on e
> Works in IE7, FireFox, but not in IE 6.
> Is it expectable?
Check the img.complete property. IE won't fire the load event if the
image is retrieved from cache.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQu
> jQuery 1.3rc2 is ready.
It certainly is! It's rockin' for me - all my plugins are running w/o
a hitch. Great work, everybody!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to
> cool. is this the same issue identified in #3737 with the script not
> having a parentNode or something else, cause my testcase, the script
> injected is identical for both the success and failure and i thought
> the fix for this ticket was committed before RC1 so i kinda thought it
> would work
ly different to
> show different displayed row count. both variants work in 1.2.6.
>
> maybe malsup can make a reduced testcase? perhaps this is a different
> bug? error message is still the same, elem.parentNode is null.
Thanks for posting this, Leon. I thi
> malusp and i reopened this one, maybe you guys can take a look? pretty
> please?
>
> http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3737
Created a test page that shows the bug without Taconite:
http://jquery.malsup.com/test13/test-script-1.3b2.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rece
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3739
Demo: http://jquery.malsup.com/test13/test-animate-1.3b1.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3737
TypeError occurred at line 1017 when ret[i] referred to a script
element (FF3.05).
1016if ( jQuery.nodeName( ret[i], "script" ) ) {
1017ret[i].parentNode.removeChild( ret[i] );
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
> Now that I look at this again... it simply doesn't fit the way we've
> been doing things until now.
On the topic of Applets, I came across a problem in IE when clone is
used on an element that contains an applet. In my case I'm using
jQuery UI to make a set of divs sortable. The divs contain
> I commited a few major QUnit updates
Wow, sounds great, Jörn!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsu
14 matches
Mail list logo
