On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:38, Julian Aubourg wrote:
> .remove() ?
>
$.trigger();
> 2009/11/24 Samer Ziadeh
>
> $.hell('YES!');
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 21:22, wrote:
>>
>>> Beautiful Brazilian Girls xe2x80x93 Samba mixe
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribe
t; To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
>
--
Samer Ziadeh
ww
options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jQuery Development" group.
> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
I support this as well.
On 2009-10-28, at 3:15 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
> ditto.
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM, weepy wrote:
>>
>> i strongly support this.
>>
>> to my mind the notion that you can exclusively apply feature
>> detection
>> to the extremely complex browsers is optimistic.
>
How does it perform if you remove the .find(), so you get $('#mySelect
option:selected').text()
On 2009-09-21, at 10:50 AM, matthew_maxwell wrote:
>
> I've been using jQuery for a little bit now, and have noticed that
> whenever you are attempting to use jQuery on selects with a large
> amount
Hi,
I was reading over the slides at the conf, and I wanted to ask about
the right to left for selectors. How is it more efficient to get all
divs and then find the ID as opposed to get the ID and then get it's
divs?
scenario:
#id div
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > selector and cycles through them to find if "this" is any
> of those
> > > > > > > > > elements.
> >
> > > > > > > > > If my memories about my algorithm lec
>
>>> --John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:21 AM, jeanph01 wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>> My code is 2x faster (according to firebug profile) with the 1.3.3
>>>> nightly build compared
>> > + jsonReviver: null
> >> >},
> >> >
> >> >// Last-Modified header cache for next request
> >> > @@ -565,7 +566,7 @@
> >> >// Get the JavaScript ob
text" property does not correspond with the "context"
> > > > parameter. I'm not too bothered about it but it seems to be causing
> > > > confusion elsewhere.
> >
> > > Correct - regardless of what's passed in as the context argument
l and mess up the look of the site. any ideas on why or how
> to fix this?
>
> >
>
--
Samer Ziadeh
www.samerziadeh.com
"Let It Be"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"j
er project section, it is very choppy, and jitters past
> > the boundaries of its containing element.
> >
> > I've tried removing the large image, reducing the list set down to a
> > mere 3 elements, removing the other DOM elements involved (the project
> > details), and
Not possible. The ability to change
Yeah I was reading over the ES5
--
Samer Ziadeh
www.samerziadeh.com
"Let It Be"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" gr
supports the first parameter, though, not the second. So the
> above example would work, but Daniel Friesen's won't (until browsers
> get ES5 support).
>
> On Aug 13, 8:29 pm, Samer Ziadeh wrote:
> > So how would this translate to the update method without the new
have it wrong?
var boy = Person();
var girl = Person();
> You could even chose to make those non-enumerable or lock them with values.
>
Yeah I was reading over the specifications, but I haven't really thought
about it fully as to how implement
at was recently brought into
> the harmony group, makes this possible:
> function Foo() {
>return {
> [parent: Foo.prototype],
>
> foo: "I'm a value",
> const _bar: "You can't set or delete me after this",
> };
> }
>
&g
use it disappears in ES5 as
>> it's no longer the only way to create new objects with a set prototype.
>> There's nothing strange about having a $ function and creating an object
>> from it, in fact it's closer to real prototype-based programming than
>> the `n
t; callback?
>
> I never said that was inferior, I merely explained the context for why
> the decision was made.
> >
>
--
Samer Ziadeh
www.samerziadeh.com
"Let It Be"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
> > should be called.
> >
> > http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/2542
> >
>
--
Samer Ziadeh
www.samerziadeh.com
"Let It Be"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
&quo
try changing the datatype to 'jsonp'
On Aug 3, 12:10 pm, ccha wrote:
> I'm receiving the error "access to restricted uri denied line 3395"
> Making an ajax call to a web service using jQuery. The web service
> resides on a server that also has a javascript file with calls to the
> various web me
nvalid and suggested to bring it up here:
>> http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4946
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--
Samer Ziadeh
www.samerziadeh.com
"Let It Be"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
I rather like that idea, it should be very helpful.
On Jul 18, 7:46 pm, John Resig wrote:
> As it stands we don't provide an explicit way to remove .hover() events.
> They can be removed using .unbind("mouseenter/mouseleave") - which is what
> would need to happen here, as well.
>
> It's a good
I found it tricky to use an automated combiner thingy in that it
doesn't know the order of the javascripts to be added to the page.
On Jul 3, 10:46 am, Thijs Houtenbos
wrote:
> You make a good point that you put an extra load on the server by
> compressing each time (even if only a little becaus
Hi I couldn't find documentation for $.ready() in the docs without a
parameter. Does it just trigger the DOM Ready event?
On Jul 2, 6:30 am, Ricardo wrote:
> You can call jQuery.ready() to fire all the queued functions.
>
> On Jun 30, 9:49 pm, Steven Parkes wrote:
>
> > I dynamically load jquer
gin namespacing.
>
> --
> Trey
>
> On Jun 24, 2:50 am, Bob Spryn wrote:
>
> > Cool. Good suggestion. Very smart.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Bob
>
> > On Jun 23, 2:48 am, samer wrote:
>
> > > It's not wrong, but to save you all the lines in th
It's not wrong, but to save you all the lines in the switch you could
implement your functions (init, advance, ...) in an object like
var jMyPlugin = { init: function()
or
jMyPlugin.prototype.init
or whatever
so then your switch case could be replaced with
} else if (typeof
You can try passing an empty string $('#Test').val('');
I don't know whyt it's behaving that way though
On Jun 16, 8:01 pm, vdhant wrote:
> Hi guys
> I have the following case:
>
>
>
> $('#Test').val(null);
>
>
> See working example here:http://jquery.nodnod.net/cases/421
>
> In IE (i have te
lol subject should read what is wrong with IE
On Jun 16, 1:54 pm, Rick Waldron wrote:
> What I'm most perplexed about is that IE got that?
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Andrew Powell wrote:
>
> > Alas, _focusedElement != _focuedElement
>
> > On Jun 16, 4:55 am, MadeOfRose wrote:
> > >
It's a great idea, you should add it to the plugins page
On Jun 8, 6:55 am, peol wrote:
> Hey guys, been following this group for a while and thought I'd share
> my two cents with the community.
>
> I've recently developed a small plugin (~600 byte minified) that will
> let you grab CSS for an e
Does IE8 do it's XHR the same way as the older versions?
On Jun 5, 10:16 am, John Resig wrote:
> I can't think of a single thing that we could remove from jQuery that
> wouldn't also affect IE 7.0. The JavaScript and DOM implementations in
> IE 6 and 7 are virtually identical - and because of th
I don't understand, are you trying to load 3 feeds in parallel, or are
you trying to load feeds from a server running on Parallels on Mac?
On Jun 5, 7:04 am, Marcos Lavorato wrote:
> Hi for all.
>
> I have a question about the jQuery.getFeed function. How can I load
> tree different feeds parall
I am not able to load jquery.js into rhino with 1.3+, I was able to
load src/core.js though.
Is there a different way of loading jquery.js for 1.3+?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development"
I think it does make the code uglier. All this time I thought that it
would be a great idea as to not break the chain, but the code really
looks ugly in the end. It should still be made as a plugin for people
to use, but I would highly unrecommend it :)
On Jun 3, 2:25 pm, ajpiano wrote:
> In all
34 matches
Mail list logo
