y ditching the browser's http caching
> ability?
>
> ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
>
> tato wrote:
> > Hi Friesen
> > I Had forgotten to answer this question
>
> >> How much shorter can jQuery possibly m
If you want to see the document
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/introduction.html#is-this-html5?
1 Introduction
1.1 Is this HTML5?
Features that are not currently in this document that were in the
past
considered part of HTML5, or that were never part of HTML5
/wsload/b01.htm
On Jan 20, 3:09 am, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> tato wrote:
> > Thax,
>
> > First the excuses. This is a discussion about the future.
> > However, this future is in front of us.
>
> > Browser's between incompatibility in ajax was need JS Librar
ers based on metadata in messages — but
> it's still way to early to suggest putting any of that in jQuery proper. If
> you want to live on the bleeding edge, write some code. Sanding down the API
> can come once we know what the heck we want it to look like.
>
> On Jan 19,
ge is 0.00 at Atom CPU Server. Of course a lot
more testing is required.
Thanx
On Jan 20, 3:09 am, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> tato wrote:
> > Thax,
>
> > First the excuses. This is a discussion about the future.
> > However, this future is in front of us.
>
> >
.6 seconds, you really pick the 30 seconds?
# Now, Sfari-nightly support WebSockets
http://nightly.webkit.org/
On Jan 19, 6:52 pm, DBJDBJ wrote:
> @Tato, WebSocket is specified by Google Inc, and (surpise?) it works
> already in CHROME. Google has a plan to have 100% HTML5 compliant
> br
dedicated connection between the
> browser and the server that doesn't close after every message.
>
> ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
>
>
>
> tato wrote:
> > WebSockets is very faster than xhr. I think jQuery had better s
> inconsistent. I don't think we know yet if Web Sockets even need its
> help.
>
> If they do, you or someone else should write a plugin, and if the Web
> Sockets situation changes, support will be baked in.
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:01 AM, tato wrote:
> > WebS
WebSockets is very faster than xhr. I think jQuery had better support
WebSockets in Core.
The following Samples of text mining are speed comparison, WS vs XHR.
at my Office(same bloga.jp), the speed difference was following.
/* need Chrome4.0.249.0 + or Safari nightly */
http://bloga.jp/ws/jq/
Hello.
Web Sockets someone try?
Web Sockets Now Available In Google Chrome.
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/12/web-sockets-now-available-in-google.html
I started to test it.
http://bit.ly/8DPYYo
http://bloga.jp/ws/jq/js/jquery.ws-0.1pre.js
Now, I use apache + mod_pywebsocket
Another good server-s
I'm sorry. It was code not cord :p
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Fo
Hi, I began a test of v1.4 for my plugin jQchart and csv2table now.
I tested it in v1.4pre, but did not understand where there was the
latest edition now.
Where is the latest cord of v1.4?
And I'm making a cord comparison table, As assistance to test jQuery
v1.4pre,
between the jQuery versions.
12 matches
Mail list logo
