I've filed a ticket for the :eq() issue: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3873
--John
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:07 AM, David Zhou wrote:
>
> It looks like a bug in Sizzle -- specifically, when applying filters,
> it's applying to the two tables separately.
>
> See:
>
> http://media.nodnod.net/eq.
Nope, not a typo. That + character allows .eq() to used with a
stringified number.
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3102
--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com
On Jan 15, 5:15 am, "David Zhou" wrote:
> Somewhat related, there's a small but harmless typo at
>
> http://dev.jquery.com/browser/t
David -
That looks like a separate issue - could you file a bug? Thanks!
--John
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:18 AM, David Hulbert wrote:
>
> Is this issue related to this?
>
> $('div:has("p+p")') // goes into infinite loop with this HTML
> 1
>
> Test case: http://jsbin.com/atiha/edit
>
> Or sho
Is this issue related to this?
$('div:has("p+p")') // goes into infinite loop with this HTML
1
Test case: http://jsbin.com/atiha/edit
Or should I file a bug?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery
Somewhat related, there's a small but harmless typo at
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/src/core.js#L479
Is that supposed to be "return this.slice( i, i + 1 )" ?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:07 AM, David Zhou wrote:
> It looks like a bug in Sizzle -- specifically, when applying filters,
It looks like a bug in Sizzle -- specifically, when applying filters,
it's applying to the two tables separately.
See:
http://media.nodnod.net/eq.html
Note that $('table tr:eq(36)') gives none while $('table tr:eq(5)')
gives 2. One for each table.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:31 AM, John Resig
Hmm - yep - definitely looks like an issue here, will check in to it, thanks!
--John
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:27 PM, jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
wrote:
>
> I think there is an issue with :eq().
>
> Demo test case http://jsbin.com/omobe
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~--
