Hi Dan,
I think it's a good idea, I already use a similar thing, but as others
have said it may be better as a plugin.
It would be good if everyone could agree on standard class names, and
where to put the plugin -
I don't think it would be necessary to put it in $.fn
I'm not sure if tacking 'jq
I agree. The use cases for things like this can be handled more
appropriately with
static getter methods. Unless you are working with multiple documents being
rendered
under different browsers. unlikely!
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:16 AM, ajpiano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems intere
Seems interesting and if it works more power to ya but I think it's a
bit excessive to have jQuery automatically start applying classes to
all body tags unconditionally (in order to do something that the
developer might not even need). Pretty much the opposite of
unobtrusive.
On Dec 8, 10:40 am
It's an interested technique, but I think it's too opinionated to be
in jQuery core.
It should very easy to write it as a plugin though.
On 8 Dec, 14:30, "Dan Switzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A thought has a occurred to me a couple of times over the past week or
> so, it would be awful con
