As one of precedent posts was about cookie plugin into the core, I want to discuss about plugins and their quality warranty.
The reason why some features are not included in the core is that you want a lightweight library and they aren't enough frequently used, and I totally agree with that. But the inclusion in the core means that it has been developped by the jQuery team and so adds a quality warranty. A plugin can be developped by anybody and as I've seen, there are wery unstable plugins and not supported. It would be great to establish a "labelled" development pattern, which coding conventions, validation processes. In PHP, there are PEAR packages. In jQuery, there are UI widgets whose quality is warranted, but they developp only one kind of plugins. Another point would be the possibility to select like UI widgets the plugins we want to add, to permit to have only minimized file. Regards, Ludovic --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
