Re: [jquery-dev] Re: jQuery forward compatibility issues

2009-11-23 Thread Mike Taylor
I just wanted to point out that the problem described for text-shadow can be a lot more complicated than animating 4 different values, e.g.: text-shadow: 1px 1px 3px #666, -1px -1px 3px #FFF, 1px 1px #666, -1px -1px #FFF; So here you have 14 values. Also, box-shadow was removed from the CSS3 spe

Re: [jquery-dev] Re: jQuery forward compatibility issues

2009-11-19 Thread Daniel Friesen
dotnetCarpenter wrote: > ... > It's actually fun to think that even thought IE rightly deserve a lot > bashing for stopping browser innovation, it was the first browser to > support image transparency, persistent storage, gradient ect. haha! > ^_^ And then you look at what they did in ie8 to all

RE: [jquery-dev] Re: jQuery forward compatibility issues

2009-11-19 Thread Jeffrey Kretz
Wouldn't it be fair to put this under "edge cases"? When you have a CSS property that has not been implemented in a pattern similar to other long-standing properties (e.g. text-shadow-radius), it seems that animating such a combined property would fall under an edge case requiring custom code. IM