seems like there is some half way measures that needs to be cleaned up..
it's getting too late. My fix won't work but I'll take a second look in the
morning. good night :)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:16 AM, dotnetCarpenter wrote:
> This is the same issue http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/2185
>
> I'll i
This is the same issue http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/2185
I'll investigate and see if I can fix all the inline-block and table-row
animiation bugs in 1.3.2
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Anonymous wrote:
> Done :)
>
> From line 3889 to 3895 in
> http://static.telia.dk/lib/jQuery/jquery-1.3.1-m
Done :)
>From line 3889 to 3895 in
http://static.telia.dk/lib/jQuery/jquery-1.3.1-mod.js
Tested in small project in Opera9, Firefox 3, IE7, Chrome1, Safari3 on a
windows Vista box.
- dotnetCarpenter
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Anonymous wrote:
> inline-block is well supported but widely
inline-block is well supported but widely misunderstood. Even IE6 supports
it and it is much cleaner than using float that breaks the document flow.
jQuery should support this but so far I haven't been able to find anything.
I might make a patch to 1.3.1 (unfortunately there is a regression in 1.3
The inline-block property is not yet well-supported cross-browser.
Use display:block, float:left, you'll get the same results (and spot
some flaws in your layout too).
In case someone is reading this: I suppose all animations in jQuery
give the elements a display:block property? Is inline-block
5 matches
Mail list logo
