Just to clarify apply is a native javascript function implemented in
1.3
the second parameter isnt actually needed (its for defining arguments)
anyway i decided to jquerify it and ended with this:
(function ($) {
$.extend($.fn, {
apply :function (fn, args) {
return this.each(function
you can use apply()
example :
var el = $('#myDiv')[0];
var myFunc = function () {
console.log(this);
};
myFunc.apply(el, [{type : "", target : el}]);
i stumbled on this when looking through the trigger function.
probably not the best use of it, however i though it might be usefull.
-Byron
Thanks, Jonathan.
It's a best practice to use var a = this to avoid the scope leak that you
mentioned.
Cheers,
-Jonathan
On 12/18/07, Joel Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Also you might want to do "var a = this" so that it doesn't conflict
> with any global variables.
>
> Thanks, Josh. That's what I sus
> Also you might want to do "var a = this" so that it doesn't conflict with any
> global variables.
Thanks, Josh. That's what I suspected. As far as the "var a =
this"... is that because using "var" to declare the variable makes its
scope within the function alone, or is the "var" unnecessary?
I know I can use the following, and it will work, but is there
something similar in jQuery that's already available?
$('a').click(function() {
a = this;
$.ajax({
url: this.href,
success: function(data) {
alert(a.href);
}
})
});
That's the way people do it in jQuery, althou
6 matches
Mail list logo
