On Feb 4, 2009, at 1:09 AM, Pedram wrote:
Thanks Karl , It helped me alot
Not a problem. Glad to help.
Since it's not possible in a valid DOM to have an A that is a
descendant of a UL but not a descendant of an LI, the LI is
superfluous. No need to do an extra getElementsByTagName there.
Thanks Karl , It helped me alot
On Feb 1, 9:47 am, Karl Swedberg k...@englishrules.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Pedram wrote:
I have another tiny question
$(Ul li a), $(ul a), $(a,$(ul))
which one has the great performance !!?
I would go with either $('ul a') or $('a',
Thanks Karl , You are Right , I appreciate it , thank you again .
You are always the solver
On Jan 31, 11:54 am, Karl Swedberg k...@englishrules.com wrote:
Hi Pedram,
I agree with Nic. Especially if you're only dealing with 4 elements,
binding directly on them seems like the most sensible
I just had some Doubt , the performance is great
On Jan 31, 11:54 am, Karl Swedberg k...@englishrules.com wrote:
Hi Pedram,
I agree with Nic. Especially if you're only dealing with 4 elements,
binding directly on them seems like the most sensible solution.
Are you noticing performance
I have another tiny question
$(Ul li a), $(ul a), $(a,$(ul))
which one has the great performance !!?
On Feb 1, 12:02 am, Pedram pedram...@gmail.com wrote:
I just had some Doubt , the performance is great
On Jan 31, 11:54 am, Karl Swedberg k...@englishrules.com wrote:
Hi Pedram,
I
On Feb 1, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Pedram wrote:
I have another tiny question
$(Ul li a), $(ul a), $(a,$(ul))
which one has the great performance !!?
I would go with either $('ul a') or $('a', 'ul'), but $('ul a') seems
more readable to me, as it follows the CSS syntax.
Since it's not
I'm looking to improve the performance , which of these 2 codes has
the best performance.
On Jan 30, 1:04 am, Nic Luciano adaptive...@gmail.com wrote:
What exactly are you trying to do, what is the issue? Maybe just preference
here (and I'm also just guessing what you're asking) but I don't
Hi Pedram,
I agree with Nic. Especially if you're only dealing with 4 elements,
binding directly on them seems like the most sensible solution.
Are you noticing performance problems? You shouldn't be seeing any,
with scripts this basic. In any case, there are a couple selector
Dear Karl ,
I know You are Expert in these Issues do you have any idea for me
Thanks
On Jan 29, 5:44 pm, Pedram pedram...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks ,
I have some links in my Navigation bar such as below , I Used FIND
in my code , does anyone has any better solution for me ,
I also used
What exactly are you trying to do, what is the issue? Maybe just preference
here (and I'm also just guessing what you're asking) but I don't see a
reason not to put the events on the elements themselves
$(ul li a).click(function() {
10 matches
Mail list logo
