Yes. Now I understand. Thank you.
On Jan 13, 1:02 pm, Nathan Klatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, RhythmicDevil
> wrote:
>
> > If its not in the DOM why do I see it in the source? I am having a
> > disconnect here. I have fixed it as I said above. But I am curious I
> > thought the D
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, RhythmicDevil wrote:
> If its not in the DOM why do I see it in the source? I am having a
> disconnect here. I have fixed it as I said above. But I am curious I
> thought the DOM represented the HTML that is present at load time.
>
Maybe I misunderstand what you
If its not in the DOM why do I see it in the source? I am having a
disconnect here. I have fixed it as I said above. But I am curious I
thought the DOM represented the HTML that is present at load time.
On Jan 13, 12:54 pm, Nathan Klatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:36 AM, RhythmicDevil
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:36 AM, RhythmicDevil wrote:
> I did not think the selectors would enforce that.
It's not the selectors; the problem is the tr never makes it into the
DOM because the invalid html gets ignored by the browser. Because the
tr isn't in the DOM, the selector has no chance of
You are correct about that. But I did not think the selectors would
enforce that. My solution is just to put another table with the row
and hide that. Which makes it valid.
On Jan 13, 12:03 pm, Nathan Klatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:15 AM, RhythmicDevil
> wrote:
> > So it seems I can
5 matches
Mail list logo
