What are your opinions of this editor for folks who are somewhat squeamish to change (ie, used to MS Word)? I need to encourage html origination for some kinds of files (policies, procedures, etc...), and I would like something that is slimmer and simpler than tinyMCE.
On Nov 21, 9:45 am, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the CMS I am currently working on I have decided to go with WYM as > the inline HTML editor. TinyMCE seems to do weird things that > preclude using FireBug to debug scripts. > > From what I've been able to figure out from the documentation it is > possible to have external events trigger editor events such as > selecting the paragraph type, CSS style etc, so I've decided to use > that approach as it seems easier than trying to significantly edit the > editor itself to look how I need it to. I'm still figuring out the > interface to the editor, but at the moment my main concern is an issue > of presentation. > > Currently what I have is the editor sitting inside a div with explicit > width and heights set. What I need is for the WYSIWYG portion of the > editor to completely fill this div, and for the rest of the stuff in > default editor frame to not be there (the toolbar, side panels, etc). > Is this difficult to achieve? How do I go about doing it?
