Hi Mike,
thanks for you reply. You are absolutely right.
Tunnel vision and tiredness are a great combi ;-)
Thanks!
Henjo
On Dec 16, 5:06 pm, Michael Geary wrote:
> I'm glad you fixed your problem, but I'm certain that the conclusion ("IE
> has trouble with a chained ajax call") is wrong. In the
I'm glad you fixed your problem, but I'm certain that the conclusion ("IE
has trouble with a chained ajax call") is wrong. In the code you posted in
the other thread, the chained and non-chained versions are quite different.
You didn't just cut the chain into parts: the non-chained version uses a
c
For anyone looking for the solution I found, please read the thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/2d570db96ed7f02a
Henjo
On Dec 15, 2:32 pm, Henjo wrote:
> Hi MorningZ,
>
> thanks for your thoughts. I didn't even think of that since it has
> been a couple of week
Hi MorningZ,
thanks for your thoughts. I didn't even think of that since it has
been a couple of weeks ago I built this. Only IE needed to be fixed.
I finally was able to get it fixed by putting alerts in to see where
it stopped. Apparently IE has trouble with a chained ajax call. I cut
the chain
I would *definitely* start by using the non-minified version of
jQuery, as it's 1000x easier to get an idea of what's going on (i see
in the source of the page you are using the min-ed version)
On Dec 14, 4:31 pm, Henjo wrote:
> Hey Scott,
>
> thanks for posting. I will check this out and see i
Hey Scott,
thanks for posting. I will check this out and see if I can find
something here...
Henjo
On Dec 14, 8:51 pm, "Scott Stewart" wrote:
> There is a Firebug Lite which runs in IE, it's not nearly as good as
> Firebug, but it's better than nothing (or the "developer tools" in IE8
>
>
>
> -
6 matches
Mail list logo
