Well, my point was JS operators, whether it be "==" or "===", would be
easiest/best in the case of comparing two values...
On Jan 20, 6:46 pm, Klaus Hartl wrote:
> On 20 Jan., 20:06, MorningZ wrote:
>
> > but just comparing "value a" to "value b", it doesn't get any easier/
> > better tha
On 20 Jan., 20:06, MorningZ wrote:
> but just comparing "value a" to "value b", it doesn't get any easier/
> better than JavaScript's native "==" operator
Not so fast. Be aware that the equality operator may give you
unexpected results because of type conversion, example:
0 == '' // => true
0 =
As Ricardo mentions that still isn't grasped here
jQuery *is* JavaScript, but it's a framework on top to make things
easier
easier in all cases? heck no case in point
"So what's the best jQuery way to compare element values"
Why would there need to be a jQuery way?
object1.value == objec
On Jan 19, 4:28 pm, MorningZ wrote:
> If you look @ the document for ".is()"
>
> http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/is#expr
Ah (light bulb goes off above head), now I get it. It hadn't occurred
to me to look in the "Traversing" section of the docs. You really do
have to internalise the mindset be
Keep in mind that jQuery is merely a framework. You're still working
with plain Javascript. The learning curve for it should be smooth as
butter after you get to understand what's going on behind the scenes.
is() is a method, a function owned by the current jQuery object. val()
returns the value
If you look @ the document for ".is()"
http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/is#expr
Checks the current selection against an expression and returns true,
if at least one element of the selection fits the given expression
--
6 matches
Mail list logo
