Hi Nate, Thanks again for your reply. You've supplied some good
resources and explanations, and I'm getting a better understanding.
However, each time I 'think' I've got it, I come across a situation that
just proves I don't. It's going to be a struggle, but I'm determined to
get to the 'p
Nate, beautiful!
the tricky:
obj2.run.call(instance); // now obj2.run is called, it's own 'this' points
to obj instead of obj2
shows that this is not always what is seems to be! call and apply are both
ways to override this.
Because they are tricky... I like to isolate call and apply to the bo
Hi Glenn,
Closures are a pretty tough concept to fully explain. In this case, I should
have just said to use an "anonymous function", as it would probably lead to
less confusion.
Here is a great online resource about closures that really helped me a lot:
http://www.hunlock.com/blogs/Closing_The_B
Hi Nate,
First of all, thank you very much for taking the time to respond. It's
greatly appreciated.
I had to modify your solution slightly, in that the ajax.complete
callback passes two parameters which I need, so I changed the code to...
var instance = this;
$.ajax(
{
type: "
Hi Glenn,
Keeping scope is definitely one of the more frustrating aspects of
Javascript sometimes.
What's happening is that you're running the ajax call, and the complete
method is a method of the object that you're passing into the ajax handler.
So this now points to the object containing the
5 matches
Mail list logo
