No sweat. We appreciate that and if you ever need any help or additional
info, please don't hesitate to ask. We definitely like articles and
press and are more than happy to help.
Rey...
martykube wrote:
Hi Rey,
Next time I write someting about jQuery, I'll send it here for a pre-
public
On May 31, 8:38 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for coming over and getting more feedback on jQuery, Marty. The
> community is very supportive of this project so anything that's written
> which may not be 100% on target will be scrutinized. Even better,
> though, is the fact th
Thanks for coming over and getting more feedback on jQuery, Marty. The
community is very supportive of this project so anything that's written
which may not be 100% on target will be scrutinized. Even better,
though, is the fact that we try to work with the author in question to
ensure accura
On May 21, 4:22 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >Rey, I'm a little dense here, but not exactly sure what he is trying to say
> >with this line:
>
> > "However, it does not support a reusable programming model like an object
> >oriented approach, so you should not expect tho
As others have mentioned, plugins are the main form of reusable code.
This is not very different from creating a carefully constructed
Object in a OO language. In fact I find most OO languages to not have
very reusable code, the only languages that support re-usability in my
opinion, are function
I had a similar problem before... There were "some people" who could
not think in anything else other than regular OO and knocked jQuery.
Sad story. I believe this model is exactly what makes jQuery strong:
it's ability to not be constrained to object trees, but be able to mix
as the selectors req
Bil Corry wrote:
Benjamin Sterling wrote on 5/21/2007 12:58 PM:
"However, it does not support a reusable programming model like an
object
oriented approach, so you should not expect thousands of lines of JQuery
code to be a good asset to your project"
can anyone clarify. Is this a complimen
Thanks guys, that is what I thought, but the wording was throwing me off.
I agree that you can create a good amount of re-usable code using jquery as
a dom helper.
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://www.KenzoMedia.com
http://www.KenzoHosting.com
>Rey, I'm a little dense here, but not exactly sure what he is trying to say
>with this line:
>
> "However, it does not support a reusable programming model like an object
>oriented approach, so you should not expect thousands of lines of JQuery
>code to be a good asset to your project"
>
>can any
Benjamin Sterling wrote on 5/21/2007 12:58 PM:
"However, it does not support a reusable programming model like an object
oriented approach, so you should not expect thousands of lines of JQuery
code to be a good asset to your project"
can anyone clarify. Is this a compliment or a knock agains
Rey, I'm a little dense here, but not exactly sure what he is trying to say
with this line:
"However, it does not support a reusable programming model like an object
oriented approach, so you should not expect thousands of lines of JQuery
code to be a good asset to your project"
can anyone clari
11 matches
Mail list logo
