[jQuery] Re: Pack or Min | Which is better for faster loading?

2008-10-14 Thread Bil Corry
Sridhar Kuppalli wrote on 10/14/2008 11:32 AM: > Which of these are better for faster loading? > > jquery-1.2.6.min.js(size-54kb) > > jquery-1.2.6.pack.js (size-30kb) > The min version. Even better, enable gzip compression at the server. And even better still, use the Expires

[jQuery] Re: Pack or Min | Which is better for faster loading?

2008-10-14 Thread Eric
My personal recommendation is to go with the "min" version of jQuery and any plugins. As Crockford says: "Any transformation carries the risk of introducing a bug." http://yuiblog.com/blog/2006/03/06/minification-v-obfuscation/ A Combo of JSLint and JSMin is about as safe as you can get. -E On

[jQuery] Re: Pack or Min | Which is better for faster loading?

2008-10-14 Thread MorningZ
This blog post sheds some light on your question http://ejohn.org/blog/library-loading-speed/ On Oct 14, 12:32 pm, "Sridhar Kuppalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Which of these are better for faster loading? > > jquery-1.2.6.min.js        (size-54kb) > > jquery-1.2.6.pack.js