Remy Sharp ha scritto:
Ouch! Sorry about that.
I didn't have time to add functionality that saved the window position
- but when this is in (v. soon), I'll initialise the window at
640x480, then changing the window's position and size will be saved
for the next time it's opened.
Cheers,
Remy
Ouch! Sorry about that.
I didn't have time to add functionality that saved the window position
- but when this is in (v. soon), I'll initialise the window at
640x480, then changing the window's position and size will be saved
for the next time it's opened.
Cheers,
Remy.
On Jan 17, 11:08 am, G
@rem I've tried contacting you on twitter, but I'm new to it, and don't
know If you received my message.
I've installed the AIR api browser, and I love it, but when I open it
the dimensions of the windows are greater than my desktop resolution
(1280x800 on windows xp).
Here you can see a s
Well, i for one really love the new API interface _ such a much less
noisy interface than the docs.jquery.com interface! clearer, snappier.
it turns out i don't use the navigation menu much, i use the filter
box mostly. that's probably why i'm not so annoyed by its limits.
really liked the interfa
I think the animation of menus is one for the options as well then. I
understand what you mean, once you're familiar with it, you just want
to get on with it.
On Jan 15, 9:28 pm, Ricardo Tomasi wrote:
> Two things bother me more:
>
> - James' #3 point, that other categories hide when you click
Two things bother me more:
- James' #3 point, that other categories hide when you click one, an
accordion would be a better fit for quick navigation.
- the subcategories. I like to see the method's names directly,
deciding between "Hierarchy" or "Child filters" is not an intuitive
task. They shou
Hi James,
Thank you for your detailed feedback - all good points.
I want to push out another release when 1.3.1 goes live - so I'd like
to get some, if not all, of the feedback addressed (including others).
1 + 2) almost the same thing - the first problem I see is the AIR
browser, which obvious
I'd like to see the ability to post a link that goes directly to a
given summary page for a function makes it easier to direct
people to a certain area (say for instance, posting in this mailing
list)
On Jan 15, 11:43 am, Pappy wrote:
> My biggest issue with the new site is a lack of 'summa
My biggest issue with the new site is a lack of 'summary' screens. I
love being able to look at one page and take in all functions of a
various type. Especially when there are two that are awfully similar
and I can scan back and forth to differentiate between them.
On Jan 14, 8:22 pm, James Van
9 matches
Mail list logo