Thanks very much, this way it takes 2 seconds (with load and rendering),
what is better I was expecting
On this project, I totally ignore IE (I am using some newer technologies
available only in "normal" browsers), it is not a common website but a
web-based application for a specific gro
> From: Martin Tiršel
> I need to hold some things in memory for later use, so pure
> html is not ideal. I will try JSON, if it will be under 5-7
> seconds for 500 items, it should be ok.
In fact, you can get it much faster than that, even in IE.
Let's assume your JSON data is an exact mirror
I need to hold some things in memory for later use, so pure html is not
ideal. I will try JSON, if it will be under 5-7 seconds for 500 items, it
should be ok.
Thanks
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:01:33 +0100, Michael Geary wrote:
If you are free to change the XML format, are you free to cha
If you are free to change the XML format, are you free to change it
completely?
Could you change it to HTML instead, and format the HTML in the same way
that you are doing in JavaScript now? Then you could simply use
$('#content_window_pages').load(...); and it would be very fast.
Or you could u
Read through this post to help speed up DOM inserts:
http://www.learningjquery.com/2009/03/43439-reasons-to-use-append-correctly
On Mar 23, 3:46 pm, Martin Tiršel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I get XML answer from server with ~5k lines and I need to parse this data
> into the table and display in HTML.
5 matches
Mail list logo
