On Sep 25, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Bertilo Wennergren wrote:
Karl Swedberg wrote:
Internally, jQuery determines whether to use document.createElement
by checking the string against a regular expression:
rsingleTag = /^<(\w+)\s*\/?>$/
Unless I'm missing something, allowing for both syntaxes wo
Karl Swedberg wrote:
Internally, jQuery determines whether to use document.createElement by
checking the string against a regular expression:
rsingleTag = /^<(\w+)\s*\/?>$/
Unless I'm missing something, allowing for both syntaxes would be
trivial. Just change the regex to something like
Vincent Robert wrote:
> On Sep 24, 6:33 pm, Bertilo Wennergren wrote:
>> I think I read somewhere that jQuery just passes the
>> code along to the "innerHTML" function of the browser.
>> That would mean that the actual rules are those of the
>> browsers' various implementations of "innerHTML" (
On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Vincent Robert wrote:
Actually, jQuery does some parsing by itself first.
The $('') syntax is actually a shortcut to
document.createElement("span"), and yes, the "/" is required here.
So $
('') will be faster than $('') which will have to
go through innerHtml.
Actually, jQuery does some parsing by itself first.
The $('') syntax is actually a shortcut to
document.createElement("span"), and yes, the "/" is required here. So $
('') will be faster than $('') which will have to
go through innerHtml.
Regards,
On Sep 24, 6:33 pm, Bertilo Wennergren wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Bertilo Wennergren wrote:
>
> The question about "" arose when I was demonstrating
> how the same inline JS example is supposed to look like in HTML
> and in XHTML. When I was changing one version from it's XHTML
> incarnation into an HTML incarnation, removing all
Richard D. Worth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Bertilo Wennergren wrote:
Richard D. Worth wrote:
Best practice, valid HTML, and compatible with XHTML would be
$('#whatever').html('');
$('#whatever').html('');
$('#whatever').html('');
Well, not quite "valid" HTML...
quite va
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Bertilo Wennergren wrote:
>
> Richard D. Worth wrote:
>
> Best practice, valid HTML, and compatible with XHTML would be
>> $('#whatever').html('');
>> $('#whatever').html('');
>> $('#whatever').html('');
>>
>
> Well, not quite "valid" HTML...
>
quite valid. See
Richard D. Worth wrote:
Best practice, valid HTML, and compatible with XHTML would be
$('#whatever').html('');
$('#whatever').html('');
$('#whatever').html('');
Well, not quite "valid" HTML...
If you use "" in an HTML 4.01 page, the validator at
"w3.org" gives a warning with the following ex
Best practice, valid HTML, and compatible with XHTML would be
$('#whatever').html('');
$('#whatever').html('');
$('#whatever').html('');
- Richard
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Bertilo Wennergren wrote:
>
> Richard D. Worth wrote:
>
> I won't speak to the jQuery documentation, nor jQuery's
Richard D. Worth wrote:
I won't speak to the jQuery documentation, nor jQuery's internal
implementation for $(html), only your questions about HTML and XHTML, based
on my own knowledge and best practices: [...]
Thanks!
So if I understand your points, the following examples can be called
"be
I won't speak to the jQuery documentation, nor jQuery's internal
implementation for $(html), only your questions about HTML and XHTML, based
on my own knowledge and best practices:
*Non-void elements (sometimes called non-empty elements, meaning they can
contain text and child nodes)*
For an empty
12 matches
Mail list logo
