While firebug's profile is ok... it inflates times quite a lot, prolly
due to all the stuff it inserts around in your code.
I compare FF w/FB vs FF w/o FB and the results were a lot different.
I'd not recommend it for very specific tests.
Also, some approaches can be faster on FF and slower on ot
thanks
:)
i use firebug but i wasnt aware of the profiling... :)
On Sep 17, 8:20 pm, Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made my own benchmarker some time ago (3-4 months).
> It's not perfect but it did the job for me.
>
> You can check it here:http://benchmarker.flesler.com/
> The
I made my own benchmarker some time ago (3-4 months).
It's not perfect but it did the job for me.
You can check it here: http://benchmarker.flesler.com/
The deploy part isn't included in the js. It's OO, you can create
Benchmarker instances.
I used it mainly to check different approaches for fre
Someone is bound to have a better answer than this, but to get you
started with profiling, have a look at this page where I include some
code to time my script execution:
http://andrew.hedges.name/experiments/simple-templates-speed-test/
It wouldn't be much of a stretch to apply this same patter
Do you use Firebug? It has a "Profile" option under the Console tab,
that will profile (duh) all js action going on while it's on, giving
you details like number of function calls and the time each took to
execute, that's plenty of information ;)
ricardo
On Sep 17, 1:14 am, Alex Weber <[EMAIL PR
5 matches
Mail list logo
