Hi,
I've included the recommended changes and tested against the nightly,
all working fine.
http://gsgd.co.uk/sandbox/jquery.easing.php
So, am I ahead of the game in releasing a 1.1.3 ready plugin
(admittedly because I didn't do it right in the first place)?
Incidently the new plugin page seem
Yes, it would be preferred - I posted that as the solution to the
ticket discussing the issue, but two issues:
1) This is a minor release (minor releases shouldn't have any
regressions - and breaking a plugin would be one).
2) None of the easing plugins have been updated yet - making it kind
of d
On Sunday 24 June 2007, John Resig wrote:
> Just to clarify: This was an issue in jQuery 1.1.3a - we've fixed the
> code in jQuery to fall back to 'linear' if it exists (thus causing
> the code to work, no problem). This fix is in SVN right now and will
> be in the final 1.1.3 release.
I'm wonder
Great, just one of the risks using bleeding edge code ;)
Just to clarify: This was an issue in jQuery 1.1.3a - we've fixed the
code in jQuery to fall back to 'linear' if it exists (thus causing the
code to work, no problem). This fix is in SVN right now and will be in
the final 1.1.3 release.
--John
On 6/24/07, Gilles (Webunity) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Ack! It looks like george.gsgd is the owner of it.
Glen
On 6/24/07, Gilles (Webunity) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
The easing plugin breaks jQuery's fadeIn etc, since they default to
"easing.swing" which is not in the easing plugin, but IS in the jQuery
core. So if you also load in jQuery.easi
6 matches
Mail list logo
