Thanks, Rey. Can you forgive a couple of old-timers for getting cantankerous
once in a while? I'm afraid it comes with the territory.
One thing is for sure: If somebody disagrees with me a lot, it means I
probably have something to learn from them. So Pops, no harm, no foul, still
friends, OK?
I
Ok, first of all, this was my original posting, which has been hijacked
to the hilt. Up till now, I haven't said anything but with the thread
escalating to the point of low blows, I'm going to put an end to this.
If you guys want to keep hashing this out, please start a new thread or
take it
query-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 8:43 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jQuery's Fearless Leader on Ajaxian
This one threw me.
> > First, let's call it jQuery, not JQUERY, so no one thinks
> > you're shouting. :-)
>
> I have no idea what the other messages you're talking
> about are, but they weren't from me.
Like I said - Its silly. Lets agree to drop this. :-)
> and I wrote the first email client
> for PCs in 1982.
> > From: Michael Geary
> > Before I forget, Hector, in the future could you start a new thread
> > for a new topic like this? (And don't just change the subject line -
> > start a new message.)
> From: Pops
> Ok, I will make it an effort to live the same "topic rules"
> we also impose in our o
On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:41 PM, Michael Geary wrote:
In JS, we already have a few pseudo-standard nomemclature,
for example a popular patten of starting functions with a
lowercase letter:
function initProcess()
I personally prefer using capitalized words for
processes/functions and lower cas
This one threw me.
On Aug 24, 3:50 pm, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Pops
> >
>
> Before I forget, Hector, in the future could you start a new thread for a
> new topic like this? (And don't just change the subject line - start a new
> message.)
Ok, I will make it an effort to live the same
> From: Pops
>
Before I forget, Hector, in the future could you start a new thread for a
new topic like this? (And don't just change the subject line - start a new
message.) You got us going on an interesting discussion of coding style
issues, but it's all under the subject "jQuery's Fearless Le
On Aug 24, 12:41 pm, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you familiar with the difference between Apps Hungarian and Systems
> Hungarian?
Not officially, see next comment. :-)
> Apps Hungarian uses the prefix to tell you something interesting and useful
> about the *purpose* of the
On Aug 24, 11:29 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do not follow all of it - on the other hand I do not know of anything
> similiar:http://javascript.crockford.com/code.html
>
> (Crockford of course)
>
Thanks Klaus.
I am just becoming familar with Crockford and I can see he is v
> From: Pops
>
> Has anyone, some web resource, some blog, something,
> discussed recommendations, standard practice for JavaScript
> coding styles?
>
> Like in C world, we use Hungarian notation.
>
> szAnything- a null terminated string
> fSomething- a flag or true/f
Pops wrote:
In JS, we already have a few pseudo-standard nomemclature, for example
a popular patten of starting functions with a lowercase letter:
function initProcess()
I personally prefer using capitalized words for processes/functions
and lower case words for data.
Anyway, is there some
Hey Rey!
How Ironic! I just logged in to post a question, saw this new post,
haven't seen it yet, but I was going to ask:
Has anyone, some web resource, some blog, something, discussed
recommendations, standard practice for JavaScript coding styles?
Like in C world, we use Hungarian notation
14 matches
Mail list logo
