RE: Re[2]: JRUN Stability- reply

2004-04-15 Thread Jon Austin
When running from the command line, I get the following two errors appear when I first run it, The strange thing is, that the 51003 port is not active prior to starting JRUN, and when I do run this command, it does activate it. ~ Jon 04/14 14:50:01 error Exception thrown in operation start [1]ja

RE: JRUN Stability- reply 2

2004-04-14 Thread Stephen Dupre
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:04 PM To: JRun-Talk Subject: Re: JRUN Stability- reply 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > You have to admit we were in some unexplored territory with that hotfix > patch.  (it's still being discussed). > >

RE: Re[2]: JRUN Stability- reply

2004-04-14 Thread Jon Austin
As is always the case, my timeframe for load-testing the server was diverted in favor of rising priorities, and so I have yet to get this going properly. I have had the metrics running overnight, but I'm still getting Zero for Zero, with Zero sessions.  There are generally 3-5 people on most of th

Re: JRUN Stability- reply 2

2004-04-14 Thread Ben Groeneveld
Original Message- > From: Ben Groeneveld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 1:12 PM > To: JRun-Talk > Subject: Re: JRUN Stability- reply 2 > > Kathy, we run primarily on windows.  I have done some tests on linux, > but not to this extent. &

RE: JRUN Stability- reply 2

2004-04-14 Thread Stephen Dupre
o: JRun-Talk Subject: Re: JRUN Stability- reply 2 Kathy, we run primarily on windows.  I have done some tests on linux, but not to this extent. Our app uses keepalive connections that remain open, so we need a very high level of concurrency.  In production we run at 750 concurrent connectio

Re: JRUN Stability- reply 2

2004-04-14 Thread Ben Groeneveld
Kathy, we run primarily on windows.  I have done some tests on linux, but not to this extent. Our app uses keepalive connections that remain open, so we need a very high level of concurrency.  In production we run at 750 concurrent connections (users) per node.  The JRun server doesn't seem to

Re: JRUN Stability- reply 2

2004-04-13 Thread Kathy Vance
Ben, How is the stability and performance of JRun server after you set activeHandlerThreads to 2000? Usually the number of the maxHandlerThreads should be bigger than activeHandlerThreads? As I understand, JRun would not perform well if the number of activeHandlerThreads is too big. Could you shar

Re: JRUN Stability- reply

2004-04-13 Thread Ben Groeneveld
This is true; to achieve high levels of concurrency we run with 2000 2000 Hope that helps, BenG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for the advice!.. > > I have Metrics turned on currently, monitoring every 20 seconds, and I get > 0/0, 0 Sessions.. > > It does specifically say Web-Threads so, I

RE: Re[2]: JRUN Stability- reply

2004-04-13 Thread Jon Austin
Thanks for the advice!.. I have Metrics turned on currently, monitoring every 20 seconds, and I get 0/0, 0 Sessions.. It does specifically say Web-Threads so, I looked for an additional setting for the proxy, (as we're using the JRUN connector via IIS on another server) but that was the only metr

RE: Re[2]: JRUN Stability- reply

2004-04-13 Thread Kathy Vance
Jon, I have the same problem while I did loading testing on JRun 4. We spent $500 for macromedia tech support in order to solve the issue. Please check your jrun.xml. There is a service called "ProxyService". You need to increase the value of the attribute named "activeHandlerThreads" to a number