I haven't used the debugging feature of JRun Studio extensively since I only used it
in a training course.
Jackie
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:17 PM, Jackie Comeau [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> I use JBuilder Profession 3.0, eventually moving to 4.0 when I start to do
> more JSP's. I
I use JBuilder Profession 3.0, eventually moving to 4.0 when I start to do
more JSP's. I've used JRun Studio recently in training and I have to say, I
really liked it. The toolbar was better, the enviroment in general was
better. It integreated better with JRun. I really do like JBuilder...and
I can't make a comparison between JBuilder and JRun Studio because I have
not used Studio. With the exception of the debugging issue that we have
been discussing I really like JBuilder. Specifically, I am using JBuilder 4
Enterprise Edition.
I have used VisualCafe, Forte, and NetBeans before an
Omnicore Codeguide is top notch.
www.omnicore.com, has some features you won't find anywhere else.
Travis
Original Message
From: "Fishwick, Randall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 2002-01-16
To: JRun-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: using IDE's
The debugger in Karmira Bugseeker is well worth the $200. Beats any debugger I've
seen, including JBuilder 5/6.
I have yet to find an editor that can compete with vim/gvim for useful features, or a
debugger as good as Karmira. All the core dev tools I need are gvim, Ant, and
sometimes Karmir
Charlie,
At our shop we use both JRun Studio and JBuilder 5 Professional. We use
them to build JSP, servlets, and java beans. In general, we use JBuilder
for development of new beans, and JRun Studio for everything else. JBuilder
5 is definitely lacking as a JSP or HTML editor compared to JRun
