Anyone using jslint should really consider all the options available
at http://www.jslint.com/lint.html
To switch off Crockfords opinion on only having one var declaration
per function, add this to the top of the file you're working with:
/*jslint onevar:false */
Since it's still in the
And,
Thanks...relying on new Date().getTime() sounds much more solid than
hoping the timers remain consistent.
-Vince
On Jan 15, 6:37 am, And Clover and-...@doxdesk.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 16:24 -0800, foldi wrote:
I have an upcoming project that involves multiple timers and need a
Here's the revised script: http://jsbin.com/ixexi3
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/
To
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:53 AM, porneL mailingl...@pornel.net wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:45:43 -, Miller Medeiros
lis...@millermedeiros.com wrote:
I still believe that this analogy fits well.. XML is stricter than HTML
and have simpler rules (all tags open and close on a sane
I want to develop multi core capable JS applications. Even if multi core
support is not all around us today it will be soon enough in the good
engines to think about it in advance.
What is the best way to go about it and which way is the most
soon-to-be-parallelized candidate?
Event-based
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Andraz andraz@gmail.com wrote:
I want to develop multi core capable JS applications. Even if multi core
support is not all around us today it will be soon enough in the good
engines to think about it in advance.
Hate to burst your bubble there, but there
Extensive usage of web worker threads? How to go about DOM manipulation from
workers in this case?
You cannot do DOM manipulation from within web worker threads. Also,
while you do get XMLHttpRequest, the responseXML property is null so
you can only get JSON from it. The only way to do DOM
Hi
I want to develop multi core capable JS applications. Even if multi core
support is not all around us today it will be soon enough in the good
engines to think about it in advance.
What is the best way to go about it and which way is the most
soon-to-be-parallelized candidate?
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.comwrote:
... And for reasons I don't understand, you've top
replied to the original post which appears below.
Please stop doing that. Thanks.
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
On 1/16/11, Shawn Stringfield shawn.stringfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm actually experimenting with localStorage and cookies. When a user comes
to a page, I will give them the option of seeing the page layout with
thumbnails vs. details of images. The layout is based on them clicking a
checkbox
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 17:38 -0800, Ryan Grove wrote:
If another developer comes along and adds some code after the second
var statement but before the second loop that assumes that i and/or
thing are undefined
The chances that someone *wants* to use an undefined variable, and
consequently
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:50 PM, And Clover and-...@doxdesk.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 17:38 -0800, Ryan Grove wrote:
If another developer comes along and adds some code after the second
var statement but before the second loop that assumes that i and/or
thing are undefined
The chances
since in your case it seems to be just one, I would just store a single
cookie with the name of the setting and since you are already using jQuery
search for a cookie plugin, it may help you with the expires and retrieving
the proper data.. or you could just use: `document.cookie =
On 1/17/11, Miller Medeiros lis...@millermedeiros.com wrote:
since in your case it seems to be just one, I would just store a single
cookie with the name of the setting and since you are already using jQuery
search for a cookie plugin,
JQ plugins are not known for robust. And they tend to have
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:20:24 -, Miller Medeiros
lis...@millermedeiros.com wrote:
I totally disagree.. I was just talking about returning the content of a
node and it's attributes, nothing about DTD, schema, error handling..
Then it's not XML any more.
the serialization process is
On 1/15/11, And Clover and-...@doxdesk.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 10:12 -0800, cancel bubble wrote:
I understand that it's good practice to declare all your vars at the
top of
your function
I disagree. This is one part of Crockford Dogma I think is badly
mistaken. It's a habit from
On 1/17/11, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/15/11, And Clover and-...@doxdesk.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 10:12 -0800, cancel bubble wrote:
\[...]
And if it matters, it is possible to make Crockford not be happy by
Correction:
it is possible to make Crockford not be
I'm actually not trying to solve the unknown by using jquery. I was able
to save sessions without using any plugins at all or using jquery for that
matter and I'm definitely not using jquery as an excuse to not learn
JavaScript but there is absolutely nothing wrong with using them both. To
each
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1/17/11, Miller Medeiros lis...@millermedeiros.com wrote:
since in your case it seems to be just one, I would just store a single
cookie with the name of the setting and since you are already using
jQuery
On Jan 18, 10:01 am, Shawn Stringfield shawn.stringfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm actually not trying to solve the unknown by using jquery. I was able
to save sessions without using any plugins at all or using jquery for that
matter and I'm definitely not using jquery as an excuse to not learn
Thanks Rob. I've got a question for you. When you began learning
JavaScript which approach did you take? Did you start with becoming
familiar with syntax and learning each aspect of the language? Would you
recommend just diving straight in with trivial projects? Just trying to
get a feel for how
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Ryan Grove r...@wonko.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:50 PM, And Clover and-...@doxdesk.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 17:38 -0800, Ryan Grove wrote:
If another developer comes along and adds some code after the second
var statement but before the
On Jan 18, 1:02 pm, Shawn Stringfield shawn.stringfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Rob. I've got a question for you. When you began learning
JavaScript which approach did you take? Did you start with becoming
familiar with syntax and learning each aspect of the language? Would you
recommend
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Diego Perini diego.per...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Miller Medeiros
lis...@millermedeiros.com wrote:
$('#my-check-box').attr('checked', true); - should work cross browser
if
it is a checkbox.
and you can check if a checkbox
On 1/17/11, Ryan Grove r...@wonko.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:50 PM, And Clover and-...@doxdesk.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 17:38 -0800, Ryan Grove wrote:
[...]
I agree with you that it would be nice to be able to keep variable
declarations as close as possible to where those
25 matches
Mail list logo
