You always get the error. it's just when you disable debugging you don't see
the errors. also it's not necessary if you are getting errors in IE you will
also get errors in FF. Most the IE errors I face like the are because of an
extra "," at the end of objects, which works in other browsers.
I
Is it only in IE? Is there any problems when you debug using
firefox(firebug)/chrome/safari/opera?
/Anders
(Please forgive if this came across short or poorly crafted, it was sent from
my phone)
26 maj 2011 kl. 03:23 skrev nasi :
> Hi
>
> when I disable script debugging in IE my program run
Hi
when I disable script debugging in IE my program runs properly but
when I enable this option I get the "Microsoft JScript runtime error:
Object expected" error on clicking links. can you please let me know
what the problem is and how I should fix it in a way that by the
enabled debugger I can c
Thx for clarification!
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Poetro wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > the first test in
> >
> > http://jsperf.com/prototype-members-vs-instance-members/6
> >
> > is written like this:
> >
> > function MyClass1() {
> >
> >
> > this._privateAttribute = 42;
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> Hi guys,
>
> the first test in
>
> http://jsperf.com/prototype-members-vs-instance-members/6
>
> is written like this:
>
> function MyClass1() {
>
>
> this._privateAttribute = 42;
>
> }
>
>
> MyClass1.prototype = {
>
>
> _privateMethod: function() {
>
>
> return this._privateAttribute;
>
LOL! Get it done. ;)
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:31 AM, keif wrote:
> On May 24, 10:31 am, Rey Bango wrote:
> > Keif,
> >
> > Some wording at the bottom of a message is something that sounds
> reasonable
> > and I *think* should be possible via Google Groups. Care to come up with
> > some wording
Hi guys,
the first test in
http://jsperf.com/prototype-members-vs-instance-members/6
is written like this:
function MyClass1() {
this._privateAttribute = 42;
}
MyClass1.prototype = {
_privateMethod: function() {
return this._privateAttribute;
},
publicMethod: function() {
On May 24, 10:31 am, Rey Bango wrote:
> Keif,
>
> Some wording at the bottom of a message is something that sounds reasonable
> and I *think* should be possible via Google Groups. Care to come up with
> some wording to help us out?
>
> Rey
Damn you all. I'll see what I can come up with :)
-keif
