Re: [JSMentors] Re: HTML11

2011-06-01 Thread Nathan Sweet
>>Competing with Flash has absolutely nothing to do the mission >>statement "to fulfill the promise of XML". I just want everyone to know that Flash already does everything in this spec, including a similar version of the save method talked about with the religion tag. There are a few features that

Re: [JSMentors] Re: HTML11

2011-06-01 Thread Jason Persampieri
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:50 PM, austincheney wrote: > I was just looking at HTML11, and am sorely disappointed. This > appears to entirely misunderstand extensibility just like > Microformats, the structure tags introduced in HTML5, and other such > technologies. When vocabulary crosses the line

[JSMentors] Re: HTML11

2011-06-01 Thread austincheney
On Jun 1, 5:26 pm, Andrew Dodson wrote: > I was looking athttp://www.html11.org/ > > And wondered if the element will expose a > save() method with a callback handler. I was just looking at HTML11, and am sorely disappointed. This appears to entirely misunderstand exten

Re: [JSMentors] HTML11

2011-06-01 Thread Poetro
2011/6/2 Andrew Dodson : > I was looking at http://www.html11.org/ > And wondered if the element will expose a save() method with a > callback handler. This is a joke right? -- Poetro -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsment

Re: [JSMentors] HTML11

2011-06-01 Thread Dean Landolt
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Andrew Dodson wrote: > I was looking at http://www.html11.org/ > > And wondered if the element will expose > a save() method with a callback handler. > What's this callback heresy? Don't you know promises are the One True ? -- To view arc

[JSMentors] HTML11

2011-06-01 Thread Andrew Dodson
I was looking at http://www.html11.org/ And wondered if the element will expose a save() method with a callback handler. -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/ To search via a non-G

Re: [JSMentors] Re: querySelectorAll

2011-06-01 Thread Diego Perini
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:51 PM, RobG wrote: > > > On Jun 1, 11:58 am, Nathan Sweet wrote: >> >>Basically all your posts. >> >> Rob, please read through an entire list before posting. You posted a lot of >> redundant information that Diego, et al went over already. > > Please point out the redunda

Re: [JSMentors] Re: querySelectorAll

2011-06-01 Thread Diego Perini
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:10 AM, RobG wrote: > > > On May 29, 6:42 pm, Diego Perini wrote: >> Nathan, >> the "querySelectorAll" method exists also on IE 8 in Standard Mode. >> >> In all IE versions < 9 there are problem with the "Universal selector" >> since their API methods returns text nodes in

Re: [JSMentors] Re: querySelectorAll

2011-06-01 Thread Nick Morgan
On 1 June 2011 12:51, RobG wrote: > > > On Jun 1, 11:58 am, Nathan Sweet wrote: >> >>Basically all your posts. >> >> Rob, please read through an entire list before posting. You posted a lot of >> redundant information that Diego, et al went over already. > > But I got tired of trying to correct e

[JSMentors] Re: querySelectorAll

2011-06-01 Thread RobG
On Jun 1, 11:58 am, Nathan Sweet wrote: > >>Basically all your posts. > > Rob, please read through an entire list before posting. You posted a lot of > redundant information that Diego, et al went over already. Please point out the redundancy. The comment that: "Also there are no "ol" elements