> whats the best approach to soft utilize of javascript? (example: picture
> slides, a little bit of
> ajax, and some form validators? There's a apropriated structure to small
> projects? Like backbone?
For small projects jQuery + custom built jQueryUI + few plugins (3rd
part or custom, using jQu
YUI, jQuery, MooTools, etc are not frameworks in my opinion. Those are
libraries to essentially normalize DOM implementations and make
certain tasks when working with the DOM easier, like DOM traversal. A
framework to me is essentially code to help organize your application
and provide it an archit
2011/7/25 Bemi Faison :
> Agreed. Combining small libraries is a path towards piecing together
> your own framework, over time. (Frankly, I don't see much advantage to
> having a single large framework, outside of a shared namespace.) That
> said, microjs.com is not maintained well, as there are ma
Agreed. Combining small libraries is a path towards piecing together
your own framework, over time. (Frankly, I don't see much advantage to
having a single large framework, outside of a shared namespace.) That
said, microjs.com is not maintained well, as there are many pull-
requests pending for th
On Jul 16, 7:14 pm, Matthew Bramer wrote:
> I played around with [`call` and `aply`] and realized .apply will only accept
> an array. However, .call will accept an array as well. What is the
> difference between these two methods and why would I use .apply when .call
> allows me to pass strings as
Consider micro-frameworks: http://microjs.com/
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/
To unsubscribe
