Check this project out: http://www.glge.org/ It is like a port of blender's
game engine to javascript and is quite advanced.
He uses setInterval(blahBlah, 1) everywhere and after that calculates the
actual fps, so I would stick to setInterval
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Nathan Sweet wrote:
>
8:53 AM, Rohit Mehta mailto:rohitrmeht...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks :-)
sent via Android
On Nov 8, 2011 10:21 PM, "kik" mailto:kik.lo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Amit is right. -1 for JQuery. Start with the basics and stay
far away from 3rd party software.
On 02/11/2011 04:24 PM, Adrian Olaru wrote:
I'm just wondering, why don't we have by now a Lua alternative to
JavaScript in the browsers?
I found Lua to be a good scripting language that has a lot of things
in common with JavaScript. Don't get me wrong, I like coding in
JavaScript but the lan
On 02/06/2011 08:06 PM, Samuel Roldan wrote:
+ green blocks with circle waves represents how the knowledge of an
individual increases the knowledge of everyone in the community
Nice! While-green-black colours look great plus the idea for the
knowledge-incremental circles is quite catching. My fa
On 02/06/2011 09:02 PM, Jorge wrote:
On Feb 6, 7:49 am, אריה גלזר wrote:
Hey
I've started playing with Node.js these last 2 weeks, but I've run into a
pickle - I'm in need of better development tools.
For now I'm using NPP, which is fine for small-scale JS development. But I'v
found myself
The speed of innerHTML depends ONLY on the DOM implementation and not on
the js code at all. If some browsers perform better when you call
el.innerHTML='' than .createElement()& el.appendChild() then it must be
considered a bug or at least crappy engine of the browser itself. I have
experienced s
