On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:05 PM, shaun shaun.ether...@gmail.com wrote:
I think i read in the Google Javascript style guide that for situations
like the one above, functions should be declared like:
var f = function...
I guess this is so var hoisting does the right thing for you?
No. I
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Peter van der Zee jsment...@qfox.nlwrote:
When you want to create functions depending on some factor (so inside an
if), as far as the specification goes, you can only use function expressions
(var f = function ...).
So, recap:
function f(){} // var f is
I found difference between JS engines in the way they handle code like
the following:
(function() {
foo(m1a);
function foo(m) { alert(f1: + m); }
foo(m1b);
if (true) {
foo(m2a);
function foo(m) { alert(f2: + m); }
foo(m2b);
}
foo(m3a);
function foo(m) { alert(f3: +
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Bruno Jouhier bjouh...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this behavior precisely defined by the ECMAScript standard, or is
it left open to interpretation?
Enter Yuri or Dmitry ;)
The simple answer is that yes, the ECMA standard specifically specifies that
function
On 14/03/11 9:36 PM, Bruno Jouhier wrote:
I found difference between JS engines in the way they handle code like
the following:
(function() {
foo(m1a);
function foo(m) { alert(f1: + m); }
foo(m1b);
if (true) {
foo(m2a);
function foo(m) { alert(f2: + m); }
foo(m2b);
