As I've said in your comments section, I think this is a really good
idea. We need to get away from the old instanceof/constructor thing,
and fully embrace duck-typing. This looks a nice way of formalising
that.
On 21 March 2011 14:33, npup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a little utility to help out wi
Hi,
I wrote a little utility to help out with checking status of objects.
More specifically, checking their conformance with a "signature" that
you provide along with the check.
It is partly meant to help out when expecting "quacker" objects to be
sent as parameters to your functions - you know,
