Thanks for the response.
On Jun 21, 10:41 am, "David Marrs" wrote:
> You're not overwriting the namespace, but extending it, so you wouldn't want
> to fail if an object is already there. It just means that you can separate
> your code out into separate files in a reliable way.
>
> You can also
On 21 June 2011 13:46, Philip Schweiger wrote:
> Ok, that makes a bit more sense. I can see that working when you have
> complex code with different dependencies loading at different times. I
> think it makes a bit less sense when dealing with smaller, self-
> contained modules as opposed to names
Ok, that makes a bit more sense. I can see that working when you have
complex code with different dependencies loading at different times. I
think it makes a bit less sense when dealing with smaller, self-
contained modules as opposed to namespaces, though - in that case, I
still think it would mak
