On 12/17/10, RobG wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 16, 5:35 am, Balázs Galambosi wrote:
>> I wonder if google groups is safe from spam... Just look what happened
>> to comp.lang.javascript
>
> And who is to blame for that?
>
> clj is not a Google Group, it is a Usenet news group. The vast
> majority of the sp
Thanks for the heads up.
2010/12/17 RobG :
>
>
> On Dec 16, 5:35 am, Balázs Galambosi wrote:
>> I wonder if google groups is safe from spam... Just look what happened
>> to comp.lang.javascript
>
> And who is to blame for that?
>
> clj is not a Google Group, it is a Usenet news group. The vast
>
On Dec 16, 5:35 am, Balázs Galambosi wrote:
> I wonder if google groups is safe from spam... Just look what happened
> to comp.lang.javascript
And who is to blame for that?
clj is not a Google Group, it is a Usenet news group. The vast
majority of the spam there is from entities using Google g
Yep which is exactly what we're doing here. :)
Glad to see you here Chris.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Nothing is same from spam. :) But the best way to protect any group
> is to moderate new members.
>
> On Dec 15, 11:35 am, Balázs Galambosi wrote:
> > I wonder if
Nothing is same from spam. :) But the best way to protect any group
is to moderate new members.
On Dec 15, 11:35 am, Balázs Galambosi wrote:
> I wonder if google groups is safe from spam... Just look what happened
> to comp.lang.javascript
>
> -http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascrip
