The page took a very long time just to display for me in both firefox 4beta9
and chrome (latest). Ran tests on both.
==Lee
On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Bill Heaton pixelhand...@gmail.com wrote:
Correction:
http://jsperf.com/jquery-selector-with-context-as-object/5
Oops, I forgot the
Hi
as I remembered a while ago maybe at jQuery 1.2x or 1.3x, people recommended
using .find or $(selector, context), one thing is simply because .find was
just faster. Then I think it was John himself said that they both should do
the same thing (performance wise). Now at jQuery 1.4 or 1.5, I
On 1/20/11, Steven Yang kenshin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
as I remembered a while ago maybe at jQuery 1.2x or 1.3x, people recommended
using .find or $(selector, context), one thing is simply because .find was
just faster. Then I think it was John himself said that they both should do
the same
On 1/21/11, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/20/11, Steven Yang kenshin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
as I remembered a while ago maybe at jQuery 1.2x or 1.3x, people
recommended
using .find or $(selector, context), one thing is simply because .find
was
just faster. Then I think it
I just added one more test case to be fair comparing the cached object
when selecting; so cached object used for context and also previous
to .find() ...
// method I prefer to use
var area1 = document.getElementById('mypage');
$('.stuff', area1)
$('.morestuff', area1)
// method faster in firefox
