Re: Two questions

1999-09-03 Thread Gabriel Lawrence
in JSP1.0 <%! declaration %!> is defined as "Declares variables or methods valid in the page scriptiong language" I would suspect you'd be safe defining a function in here... I haven't tried it so, YMMV... -gabe Mike McElligott wrote: > > > 1. Last night I was attempting to use a RequestDispa

Re: JSP Form

1999-08-27 Thread Gabriel Lawrence
Sorry to keep this thread going but I felt this needed to be corrected. Your statements are not true... The expression str1==str2 is true because they reference the same string object. String constants like "hello" are autamatically interned for you. Interning makes a strings of equal value poin

Re: JSP Form

1999-08-27 Thread Gabriel Lawrence
='s tests object equality, .equals tests content equality... so the first test looks to see if the two strings contain the same characters, the second test looks to see if the two strings are the same String object... Just to make sure that it is confusing, you can make strings resolve to the sa

Re: passing parameters from one jsp to another (tms)

1999-08-26 Thread Gabriel Lawrence
, but I want it to have the variables in the same scope as the JSP... thanx, -gabe Gabriel Lawrence wrote: > Does this work on Jrun (v2.3.3 windows nt?) I get the following message when I > try and use the <%@include file=""%> tag... > > 500 Internal Server Error

Re: passing parameters from one jsp to another (tms)

1999-08-26 Thread Gabriel Lawrence
Does this work on Jrun (v2.3.3 windows nt?) I get the following message when I try and use the <%@include file=""%> tag... 500 Internal Server Error JSP Parse Error JSP Directive fileis not recognized. any ideas? Darin Wilson wrote: > Using the include directive (as you are doing) rather than

Re: listserv JAIL

1999-07-09 Thread Gabriel Lawrence
A tip I've found to be very useful in cases were I cant get off a list is to send mail to the postmaster at the machine where the listserv is hosted. The postmaster alias is the person at a site who has ultimate responsibility for the email server, its in one of the RFC's somewhere... Anyway, they