JSP is new and is for more web servers than ASP, ASP is older than JSP.
JSP going to be like (or more) than ASP in future...
Yeah, except that, unlike ASP, you have to pay for JSP.
tk.
===
To unsubscribe, send email to
-Original Message-
From: Jason Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 11, 1999 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: i thought very few people know JSP!
Windows - IIS - ASP: NOT FREE
Huh ? ASP is standard with IIS 3/4 as far as I know.
Where did
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 11, 1999 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: i thought very few people know JSP!
He means that Micro$oft's OS and WebServer are
not 'cost-free' options for most people.
got
From: Chris Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: JSP versus servlets
Printlns in servlets are a terrible way of doing things, worse than
embedded
html in perl scripts, in my book.
Do something like this:
println (
The only reason I use JSP is because I need to enable
our customers to modify the presentation. If you don't need
to expose the presentation logic to another person,
your Web page designer or customers, there is no real
compelling reason to use JSP. println in servlets is not so
bad after all.
Sorry, I misquestioned. here is the correction.
-Original Message-
From: TK Sung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 12:25 PM
Subject: discovering jsp path, etc (0.92, HttpServer)
Obviously newbie questions here. (Please point me
I only started on 0.92 this week and 1.0 today, but I was wondering
about this too. I thought INCLUDEIF, LOOP, DISPLAY etc were
interesting "macros" that ASP did not provide. JSP 1.0 code
that you described now looks much like ASP with java instead
of vbscript.
I don't have much use for those
