Re: More on Model 2 discussion - Interesting option to Action Class approach.

2000-04-03 Thread Kevin Duffey
Hi Craig, Thank you for the reply. Point is well taken. I agree with what you say about using a class that is geared to only one role. The one thing I didn't get an answer on from anyone yet is how to pass the same bean used by the forwarded JSP page, to the EJB, and get it back again. I am not

Re: More on Model 2 discussion - Interesting option to Action Class approach.

2000-04-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Kevin Duffey wrote: > [snip] > He made in interesting point. If the action class only implements this > Action interface, thus the perform() method, (note..this is in my current > implementation of it, not the more advanced ones Daniel and Craig are > using), why not eliminate the action class, a

More on Model 2 discussion - Interesting option to Action Class approach.

2000-04-03 Thread Kevin Duffey
Hi all, In the interest of our discussion on Model 2, a co-worker (Java guru) has asked me why there are so many classes involved in the steps as I showed him. I explained that there is a controller servlet, action class, javabean, ejb (possibly both session and entity) and jsp page. The javabean